These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38266818)
1. Brief guidelines for beginners on how to perform and analyze esophageal high-resolution manometry. Latorre-Rodríguez AR; Mittal SK Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024; 47(6):661-671. PubMed ID: 38266818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM. Dhawan I; O'Connell B; Patel A; Schey R; Parkman HP; Friedenberg F Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Dec; 63(12):3178-3186. PubMed ID: 30276571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry. Fox MR; Pandolfino JE; Sweis R; Sauter M; Abreu Y Abreu AT; Anggiansah A; Bogte A; Bredenoord AJ; Dengler W; Elvevi A; Fruehauf H; Gellersen S; Ghosh S; Gyawali CP; Heinrich H; Hemmink M; Jafari J; Kaufman E; Kessing K; Kwiatek M; Lubomyr B; Banasiuk M; Mion F; Pérez-de-la-Serna J; Remes-Troche JM; Rohof W; Roman S; Ruiz-de-León A; Tutuian R; Uscinowicz M; Valdovinos MA; Vardar R; Velosa M; Waśko-Czopnik D; Weijenborg P; Wilshire C; Wright J; Zerbib F; Menne D Dis Esophagus; 2015; 28(8):711-9. PubMed ID: 25185507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classifying Esophageal Motility by FLIP Panometry: A Study of 722 Subjects With Manometry. Carlson DA; Gyawali CP; Khan A; Yadlapati R; Chen J; Chokshi RV; Clarke JO; Garza JM; Jain AS; Katz P; Konda V; Lynch K; Schnoll-Sussman FH; Spechler SJ; Vela MF; Prescott JE; Baumann AJ; Donnan EN; Kou W; Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE Am J Gastroenterol; 2021 Dec; 116(12):2357-2366. PubMed ID: 34668487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chicago classification version 4.0 Fox MR; Sweis R; Yadlapati R; Pandolfino J; Hani A; Defilippi C; Jan T; Rommel N Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Apr; 33(4):e14120. PubMed ID: 33729668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) recommendations for the use of high-resolution manometry of the esophagus. Tack J; Pauwels A; Roman S; Savarino E; Smout A; Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 May; 33(5):e14043. PubMed ID: 33274525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Kahrilas PJ; Bredenoord AJ; Fox M; Gyawali CP; Roman S; Smout AJ; Pandolfino JE; Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):160-74. PubMed ID: 25469569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies. Laing P; Bress AP; Fang J; Peterson K; Adler DG; Gawron AJ Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pictorial presentation of 3.0 Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders. Herbella FA; Armijo PR; Patti MG Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2016; 14(3):439-442. PubMed ID: 26958977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical usefulness of esophageal high resolution manometry and adjunctive tests: An update. Gyawali CP; Penagini R Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Nov; 53(11):1373-1380. PubMed ID: 33994122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders]. Sakai M; Saito H; Kuriyama K; Yoshida T; Kumakura Y; Hara K; Sohda M; Kuwano H; Shirabe K Kyobu Geka; 2018 Sep; 71(10):894-899. PubMed ID: 30310046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings. Singendonk MM; Smits MJ; Heijting IE; van Wijk MP; Nurko S; Rosen R; Weijenborg PW; Abu-Assi R; Hoekman DR; Kuizenga-Wessel S; Seiboth G; Benninga MA; Omari TI; Kritas S Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25521418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0: Diagnostic changes and clinical implications. Sallette M; Lenz J; Mion F; Roman S Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Jan; 35(1):e14467. PubMed ID: 36314395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Differences between Chicago and traditional classifications in the diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders with high-resolution manometry and topography of esophageal pressure]. Abreu-Y Abreu AT; González Sánchez CB; Villanueva Sáenz E; Valdovinos Díaz MA Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2010; 75(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 21169108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function. Rengarajan A; Drapekin J; Patel A; Gyawali CP Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27353018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underlying etiology associated with the diagnosis of absent contractility on high resolution esophageal manometry. Alcalá-González LG; Jimenez-Masip A; Relea-Pérez L; Barber-Caselles C; Barba-Orozco E Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Jan; 46(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 35278504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned. Rohof WOA; Bredenoord AJ Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(8):37. PubMed ID: 28730503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Esophageal motility disorders: new perspectives from high-resolution manometry and histopathology. Sato H; Takahashi K; Mizuno KI; Hashimoto S; Yokoyama J; Hasegawa G; Terai S J Gastroenterol; 2018 Apr; 53(4):484-493. PubMed ID: 29134329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]