These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38266826)

  • 21. Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty Versus Fusion for Grade-I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis with Stenosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nassr A; Coric D; Pinter ZW; Sebastian AS; Freedman BA; Whiting D; Chahlavi A; Pirris S; Phan N; Meyer SA; Tahernia AD; Sandhu F; Deutsch H; Potts EA; Cheng J; Chi JH; Groff M; Anekstein Y; Steinmetz MP; Welch WC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Jun; 106(12):1041-1053. PubMed ID: 38713762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
    Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusions.
    Früh A; Leißa P; Tkatschenko D; Truckenmüller P; Wessels L; Vajkoczy P; Bayerl S
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 36194374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No Benefit with Preservation of Midline Structures in Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results From the National Swedish Spine Registry 2-Year Post-Op.
    Elmqvist E; Lindhagen L; Försth P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Apr; 47(7):531-538. PubMed ID: 34923549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Brox JI; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 34797405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The association between preoperative MRI findings and clinical improvement in patients included in the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial.
    Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 35930062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study.
    Cushnie D; Thomas K; Jacobs WB; Cho RKH; Soroceanu A; Ahn H; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Fisher CG; Glennie RA; Hall H; Jarzem P; Johnson MG; Manson NA; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Rampersaud YR; Phan P; Casha S
    Spine J; 2019 Sep; 19(9):1470-1477. PubMed ID: 31121258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Influence of Single-level Versus Multilevel Decompression on the Outcome in Multisegmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) Data.
    Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Held U; Winklhofer S; Farshad M; Pichierri G; Steurer J; Porchet F;
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1367-E1375. PubMed ID: 28059949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.
    Lambrechts MJ; Toci GR; Siegel N; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 36064090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lumbar spinal stenosis - surgical outcome and the odds of revision-surgery: Is it all due to the surgeon?
    Melcher C; Paulus AC; Roßbach BP; Gülecyüz MF; Birkenmaier C; Schulze-Pellengahr CV; Teske W; Wegener B
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(6):1423-1434. PubMed ID: 35754243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiological Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Franssen E; Indrekvam K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 May; 48(10):688-694. PubMed ID: 36809364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.