134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38267349)
1. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection in dense breasts? A retrospective preliminary study with comparable results.
Ramli Hamid MT; Ab Mumin N; Abdul Hamid S; Ahmad Saman MS; Rahmat K
Clin Radiol; 2024 Apr; 79(4):e524-e531. PubMed ID: 38267349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with a History of Breast Cancer.
Kim MY; Suh YJ; An YY
Acad Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1458-1465. PubMed ID: 35033452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk.
Weinstein SP; Korhonen K; Cirelli C; Schnall MD; McDonald ES; Pantel AR; Zuckerman S; Borthakur A; Conant EF
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 38(33):3874-3882. PubMed ID: 32931396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of lesions in dense breasts: Does tomosynthesis help?
Rangarajan K; Hari S; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Srivastava A; Parshad R
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2016; 26(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 27413268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ability of digital breast tomosynthesis to reduce additional examinations in older women.
Gharaibeh M; Alfwares AA; Elobeid E; Khasawneh R; Rousan L; El-Heis M; Al-Jarrah M; Haj Hussein AA; Altalhi M; Abualigah L
Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1276434. PubMed ID: 38076239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Suspicious Calcifications From Various Populations: A Comparison With Full-field Digital Mammography.
Li J; Zhang H; Jiang H; Guo X; Zhang Y; Qi D; Guan J; Liu Z; Wu E; Luo S
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2019; 17():82-89. PubMed ID: 30622686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical usefulness of abbreviated mri protocol in breast cancer detection.
Ramli Hamid MT; Loi KS; Chan WY; Ab Mumin N; Abdul Hamid S; Izza Rozalli F; Rahmat K
Curr Med Imaging; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37649292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus MRI as an Adjunct to Full-Field Digital Mammography for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer according to Mammographic Density.
Kim H; Yang SY; Ahn JH; Ko EY; Ko ES; Han BK; Choi JS
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 36126953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Grubstein A; Friehmann T; Dahan M; Abitbol C; Gadiel I; Schejtman DM; Shochat T; Atar E; Tamir S
Tomography; 2024 May; 10(5):806-815. PubMed ID: 38787021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI.
Förnvik D; Kataoka M; Iima M; Ohashi A; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3194-3203. PubMed ID: 29460074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
