These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38271007)

  • 21. The Importance of Random Slopes in Mixed Models for Bayesian Hypothesis Testing.
    Oberauer K
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Apr; 33(4):648-665. PubMed ID: 35357978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Worked-out examples of the adequacy of Bayesian optional stopping.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL; van Ravenzwaaij D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):70-87. PubMed ID: 34254263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Review of Bayesian Hypothesis Testing and Its Practical Implementations.
    Wei Z; Yang A; Rocha L; Miranda MF; Nathoo FS
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 35205456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Beneath the surface: Unearthing within-person variability and mean relations with Bayesian mixed models.
    Williams DR; Mulder J; Rouder JN; Rast P
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 32437184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials.
    Moerbeek M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30350025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?
    Thorlund K; Thabane L; Mills EJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian regression models outperform partial least squares methods for predicting milk components and technological properties using infrared spectral data.
    Ferragina A; de los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Cecchinato A; Bittante G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):8133-51. PubMed ID: 26387015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bayesian analysis of factorial designs.
    Rouder JN; Morey RD; Verhagen J; Swagman AR; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):304-321. PubMed ID: 27280448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expert opinion as priors for random effects in Bayesian prediction models: Subclinical ketosis in dairy cows as an example.
    Ni H; Klugkist I; van der Drift S; Jorritsma R; Hooijer G; Nielen M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244752. PubMed ID: 33444385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What is a Bayes factor?
    Schmalz X; Biurrun Manresa J; Zhang L
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):705-718. PubMed ID: 34780246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interpreting frequentist hypothesis tests: insights from Bayesian inference.
    Sidebotham D; Barlow CJ; Martin J; Jones PM
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 Oct; 70(10):1560-1575. PubMed ID: 37794259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models.
    Baribault B; Collins AGE
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36972080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research.
    Heck DW; Boehm U; Böing-Messing F; Bürkner PC; Derks K; Dienes Z; Fu Q; Gu X; Karimova D; Kiers HAL; Klugkist I; Kuiper RM; Lee MD; Leenders R; Leplaa HJ; Linde M; Ly A; Meijerink-Bosman M; Moerbeek M; Mulder J; Palfi B; Schönbrodt FD; Tendeiro JN; van den Bergh D; Van Lissa CJ; van Ravenzwaaij D; Vanpaemel W; Wagenmakers EJ; Williams DR; Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):558-579. PubMed ID: 35298215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Bayesian goodness of fit test and semiparametric generalization of logistic regression with measurement data.
    Schörgendorfer A; Branscum AJ; Hanson TE
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):508-19. PubMed ID: 23489010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A review and comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based inferences in beta regression and zero-or-one-inflated beta regression.
    Liu F; Eugenio EC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1024-1044. PubMed ID: 27230127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inclusion Bayes factors for mixed hierarchical diffusion decision models.
    Boehm U; Evans NJ; Gronau QF; Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ; Heathcote AJ
    Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37166854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decisions about equivalence: A comparison of TOST, HDI-ROPE, and the Bayes factor.
    Linde M; Tendeiro JN; Selker R; Wagenmakers EJ; van Ravenzwaaij D
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):740-755. PubMed ID: 34735173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Permutation and Bayesian tests for testing random effects in linear mixed-effects models.
    Rao K; Drikvandi R; Saville B
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(25):5034-5047. PubMed ID: 31460683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.