BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38271640)

  • 1. Validation of the Machine Learning-Based Stroke Impact Scale With a Cross-Cultural Sample.
    Lee SC; Chou CY; Chen PT; Wu TY; Hsueh IP; Hsieh CL
    Am J Occup Ther; 2024 Mar; 78(2):. PubMed ID: 38271640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a Short-Form Stroke Impact Scale Using a Machine Learning Algorithm for Patients at the Subacute Stage.
    Lee SC; Wang I; Lin GH; Li PC; Lee YC; Chou CY; Huang CY; Hsieh CL
    Am J Occup Ther; 2022 Nov; 76(6):. PubMed ID: 36410404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric properties of the short form of the Stroke Impact Scale in German-speaking stroke survivors.
    Coppers A; Möller JC; Marks D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jul; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 34332592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version.
    Carod-Artal FJ; Coral LF; Trizotto DS; Moreira CM
    Stroke; 2008 Sep; 39(9):2477-84. PubMed ID: 18635846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
    Duncan PW; Wallace D; Lai SM; Johnson D; Embretson S; Laster LJ
    Stroke; 1999 Oct; 30(10):2131-40. PubMed ID: 10512918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translation and cultural adaptation of the stroke impact scale 2.0 (SIS): a quality-of-life scale for stroke.
    Brandão AD; Teixeira NB; Brandão MC; Vidotto MC; Jardim JR; Gazzotti MR
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2018 Mar; 136(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 29791604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Derivation and Validation of a Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale.
    MacIsaac R; Ali M; Peters M; English C; Rodgers H; Jenkinson C; Lees KR; Quinn TJ;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 May; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 27207963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability of the Participation domain of the Stroke Impact Scale in persons with chronic stroke.
    Ekstrand E; Lexell J; Brogårdh C
    J Rehabil Med; 2018 Sep; 50(9):843-846. PubMed ID: 30132013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric comparisons of four disease-specific health-related quality of life measures for stroke survivors.
    Chou CY; Ou YC; Chiang TR
    Clin Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 29(8):816-29. PubMed ID: 25352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rasch Analysis of the Stroke Impact Scale-16.
    Wang I; Wang YC; Wu TY; Chou CY; Hsieh CL
    Am J Occup Ther; 2022 Nov; 76(6):. PubMed ID: 36548001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self- and proxy-report agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale.
    Carod-Artal FJ; Ferreira Coral L; Stieven Trizotto D; Menezes Moreira C
    Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):3308-14. PubMed ID: 19661469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale.
    Duncan PW; Bode RK; Min Lai S; Perera S;
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 84(7):950-63. PubMed ID: 12881816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0].
    Ochi M; Ohashi H; Hachisuka K; Saeki S
    J UOEH; 2017; 39(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 28904272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of the Nigerian (Hausa) version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 index.
    Mohammad AH; Al-Sadat N; Siew Yim L; Chinna K
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():302097. PubMed ID: 25276774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version.
    Choi SU; Lee HS; Shin JH; Ho SH; Koo MJ; Park KH; Yoon JA; Kim DM; Oh JE; Yu SH; Kim DA
    Ann Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 41(3):387-393. PubMed ID: 28758075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0.
    Vellone E; Savini S; Fida R; Dickson VV; Melkus GD; Carod-Artal FJ; Rocco G; Alvaro R
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015; 30(3):229-41. PubMed ID: 24695074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Barthel Index-based Supplementary Scales in patients with stroke.
    Lee YC; Yu WH; Hsueh IP; Chen SS; Hsieh CL
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Oct; 53(5):710-718. PubMed ID: 28178771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of two simplified 3-point balance measures in patients with stroke.
    Chen YM; Huang YJ; Huang CY; Lin GH; Liaw LJ; Lee SC; Hsieh CL
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Oct; 53(5):719-724. PubMed ID: 28084063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of life in stroke survivors: first results from the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0.
    Vellone E; Savini S; Barbato N; Carovillano G; Caramia M; Alvaro R
    Ann Ig; 2010; 22(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 21381542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.