154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38273045)
1. The effect of piston diameter in primary stapes surgery on surgical success.
Blijleven EE; Jellema M; Stokroos RJ; Wegner I; Thomeer HGXM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):2931-2939. PubMed ID: 38273045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision Stapes Surgery in a Tertiary Referral Center: Surgical and Audiometric Outcomes.
Blijleven EE; Wegner I; Tange RA; Thomeer HGXM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Nov; 128(11):997-1005. PubMed ID: 31161780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database.
Vincent R; Sperling NM; Oates J; Jindal M
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. PubMed ID: 16985478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First experience with a new stapes clip piston in stapedotomy.
Grolman W; Tange RA
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):595-8. PubMed ID: 16015152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of fenestra size and piston diameter on the outcome of stapes surgery for clinical otosclerosis.
Gristwood RE; Venables WN
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2011 Jun; 120(6):363-71. PubMed ID: 21774442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the diameter of the stapes prosthesis really matter? A prospective clinical study.
Bernardeschi D; De Seta D; Canu G; Russo FY; Ferrary E; Lahlou G; Sterkers O
Laryngoscope; 2018 Aug; 128(8):1922-1926. PubMed ID: 29171673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary stapedotomy in children with otosclerosis: A prospective study of 41 consecutive cases.
Vincent R; Wegner I; Vonck BM; Bittermann AJ; Kamalski DM; Grolman W
Laryngoscope; 2016 Feb; 126(2):442-6. PubMed ID: 26016603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing results after stapedotomy: role of the prosthesis diameter.
Marchese MR; Cianfrone F; Passali GC; Paludetti G
Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 17389788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review of the effect of different crimping techniques in stapes surgery for otosclerosis.
Wegner I; Swartz JE; Bance ML; Grolman W
Laryngoscope; 2016 May; 126(5):1207-17. PubMed ID: 26333166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stapedectomy versus stapedotomy.
Møller P
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 65():169-173. PubMed ID: 17245041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis.
Gros A; Vatovec J; Zargi M; Jenko K
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Nov; 26(6):1143-8. PubMed ID: 16272932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with a new pure gold piston in stapedotomy for cases of otosclerosis.
Tange RA; de Bruijn AJ; Grolman W
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Sep; 25(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 9799990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autogenic and xenogenic materials in stapes surgery: retrospective analysis of 350 cases.
Durko M
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 65():179-183. PubMed ID: 17245043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stapedotomy for tympanosclerotic stapes fixation: is it safe and efficient? A review of 68 cases.
Vincent R; Oates J; Sperling NM
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):866-72. PubMed ID: 12438848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of prosthesis diameter in stapes surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.
Laske RD; Röösli C; Chatzimichalis MV; Sim JH; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 21765384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of the effect of piston diameter in stapes surgery for otosclerosis on hearing results.
Wegner I; Verhagen JJ; Stegeman I; Vincent R; Grolman W
Laryngoscope; 2016 Jan; 126(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 26108164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective analysis of the results of implanting Nitinol pistons with heat-crimping piston loops in stapes surgery.
Hornung JA; Brase C; Bozzato A; Zenk J; Schick B; Iro H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Jan; 267(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 19466440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Audiometric and Functional Outcomes Between the Standard and Modified 360 Nitinol Shape Memory Stapes Prostheses.
Lavy J; Huins C; Khalil S; Hall A; Hughes O
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(8):1317-20. PubMed ID: 26164445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Promising clinical results of an innovative self-crimping stapes prosthesis in otosclerosis surgery.
Schrötzlmair F; Suchan F; Kisser U; Hempel JM; Sroka R; Müller J
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1571-5. PubMed ID: 24232058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiometric evaluation after stapedotomy with Fisch titanium prosthesis.
Ataide AL; Bichinho GL; Patruni TM
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2013; 79(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 23743748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
