These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Polishing procedures for microfilled resins. de Wet FA; Ferreira MR J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1982 Dec; 37(12):797-803. PubMed ID: 6964187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy. Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM Microsc Microanal; 2008 Oct; 14(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 18793482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Jones CS; Billington RW; Pearson GJ Br Dent J; 2004 Jan; 196(1):42-5; discussion 31. PubMed ID: 14966503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Composite and amalgam fillings in a 4-year clinical comparison]. Hoyer I; Gängler P; Niemela S Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1988; 76(7):721-6. PubMed ID: 2975115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation about the effect of start polishing time on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Hassan FM Egypt Dent J; 1980 Jan; 26(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 6948680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy). Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of tooth brushing and removal of excess filling on the surface of composite restorative resins. Bergwall O; Brännström M; Wictorin L Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1971 Jun; 64(6):347-56. PubMed ID: 5293438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The surface texture of trimmed composite fillings. A scanning electron microscopy study. Gray HS; Gavin JB N Z Dent J; 1975 Jul; 71(325):139-45. PubMed ID: 1059036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical comparison of different cervical fillings after one year]. Rich E; Schmalz G; Syndikus S Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 May; 45(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 2269112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Today's composite resins part 1: versatile, aesthetic, and conservative. Jackson RD Dent Today; 2009 Jul; 28(7):116, 118-9. PubMed ID: 19630284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The versatility of flowable composites. Rada RE Dent Today; 1998 Apr; 17(4):78-83. PubMed ID: 9791218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical study on direct and indirect Class II posterior composite resin restorations: design of the investigation. Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Kemp-Scholte CM ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 1939791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical procedures No 11. Simplified finishing procedures for posterior direct resin restorations. Freedman G Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 17(2):3 p preceding 137. PubMed ID: 15918308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cutting procedures for composite resins, especially posterior composite resins]. Ikeda T; Saitoh Y; Takano F Tsurumi Shigaku; 1983 Jan; 9(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 6572458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]