159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38273289)
1. Delayed vs. immediate placement of restorative materials over Biodentine and RetroMTA: a micro-shear bond strength study.
Celiksoz O; Irmak O
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):130. PubMed ID: 38273289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials.
Cengiz E; Ulusoy N
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 27045140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials.
Meraji N; Camilleri J
J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1343-1349. PubMed ID: 28662878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.
Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Motahari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22269237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Micro-shear bond strength of different calcium silicate materials to bulk-fill composite.
Falakaloğlu S; Yeniçeri Özata M; Plotino G
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15183. PubMed ID: 37013141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to glass ionomers.
Ergül R; Aksu S; Çalışkan S; Tüloğlu N
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):140. PubMed ID: 38281948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®).
Cantekin K; Avci S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 25141202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo.
Kaup M; Dammann CH; Schäfer E; Dammaschke T
Head Face Med; 2015 Apr; 11():14. PubMed ID: 25908430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of restorative timing on shear bond strength of composite resin/calcium silicate-based cements adhesive interfaces.
Palma PJ; Marques JA; Antunes M; Falacho RI; Sequeira D; Roseiro L; Santos JM; Ramos JC
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):3131-3139. PubMed ID: 33047203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate.
Cantekin K
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 25823484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement with ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus.
Tyagi N; Chaman C; Anand S; Dhull A; Prakash R; Tomar H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 38514429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The micro-shear bond strength of new endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putty: An in vitro study.
Özata MY; Falakaloğlu S; Plotino G; Adıgüzel Ö
Aust Endod J; 2023 Apr; 49(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 35665571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin.
Tohidkhah S; Ahmadi E; Abbasi M; Morvaridi Farimani R; Ranjbar Omrani L
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():3283211. PubMed ID: 35342752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents.
Zarean P; Roozbeh R; Zarean P; Jahromi MZ; Broujeni PM
Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 31577067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cement to Different Root Perforation Materials.
Lemos Martins Sicuro S; Gabardo MC; Castiglia Gonzaga C; Dias Morais N; Baratto-Filho F; Correr Nolasco GM; Leonardi DP
J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1819-1821. PubMed ID: 27769677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
