155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38273289)
21. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin.
Shin JH; Jang JH; Park SH; Kim E
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1210-6. PubMed ID: 25069935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preparation and properties of calcium-silicate filled resins for dental restoration. Part II: Micro-mechanical behaviour to primed mineral-depleted dentine.
Profeta AC
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):607-17. PubMed ID: 24490642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration.
Hashem DF; Foxton R; Manoharan A; Watson TF; Banerjee A
Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 24418628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin reinforced chemical cure glass ionomer, conventional chemical cure glass ionomer and chemical cure composite resin in direct bonding systems: an in vitro study.
Rao KS; Reddy TP; Yugandhar G; Kumar BS; Reddy SN; Babu DA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 23579887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bonding of glass ceramic and indirect composite to non-aged and aged resin composite.
Gresnigt M; Özcan M; Muis M; Kalk W
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Feb; 14(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 21594236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine.
Altunsoy M; Tanrıver M; Ok E; Kucukyilmaz E
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1691-5. PubMed ID: 26238526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems.
Alzraikat H; Taha NA; Qasrawi D; Burrow MF
Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):881-887. PubMed ID: 27680033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.
Sabatini C; Patel M; D'Silva E
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of intracoronal bleaching agents on the bond strength of MTA cements to composite resin and their surface morphology.
Sismanoglu S; Yildirim-Bilmez Z; Gurcan AT; Gumustas B; Taysi M; Berkman M
Odontology; 2022 Jan; 110(1):148-156. PubMed ID: 34370134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed with Water and Water-based Gel Regarding Shear Bond Strength with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite.
Kaul R; Choudhary A; Kour S; Singh A; Kumari N; Manish K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 34267002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shear Bond Strength of E. Max Ceramic Restoration to Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine): An In Vitro Study.
Al-Manei KK; Ban Owaiwid A; AlDhafiri R; Al-Manei K; AlHarran S; Alsulaimani R
Eur Endod J; 2020 Dec; 5(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 33353922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth.
Jumlongras D; White GE
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9484131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin.
Mujdeci A; Gokay O
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15343159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations.
Raskin A; Eschrich G; Dejou J; About I
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 22724110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, glass ionomer cement and composite resin when repairing large furcal perforations.
Lodiene G; Kleivmyr M; Bruzell E; Ørstavik D
Br Dent J; 2011 Mar; 210(5):E7. PubMed ID: 21394123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
