190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38273897)
1. Effects of past mating behavior versus past ejaculation on male mate choice and male attractiveness.
Chung MJ; Head ML; Fox RJ; Jennions MD
Behav Ecol; 2024; 35(2):arae002. PubMed ID: 38273897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Male allocation to ejaculation and mating effort imposes different life history trade-offs.
Chung MJ; Fox RJ; Jennions MD
PLoS Biol; 2024 May; 22(5):e3002519. PubMed ID: 38787858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the costs of pre- and postcopulatory traits for males: Evidence that costs of ejaculation are minor relative to mating effort.
Chung MJ; Jennions MD; Fox RJ
Evol Lett; 2021 Aug; 5(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 34367658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?
Ziege M; Mahlow K; Hennige-Schulz C; Kronmarck C; Tiedemann R; Streit B; Plath M
Front Zool; 2009 Aug; 6():17. PubMed ID: 19698098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mate-guarding duration is mainly influenced by the risk of sperm competition and not by female quality in a golden orb-weaver spider.
Del Matto LA; Macedo-Rego RC; Santos ESA
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12310. PubMed ID: 34733589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.
Jennions MD; Petrie M
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2000 Feb; 75(1):21-64. PubMed ID: 10740892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Male age alone predicts paternity success under sperm competition when effects of age and past mating effort are experimentally separated.
Aich U; Head ML; Fox RJ; Jennions MD
Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1955):20210979. PubMed ID: 34315259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The copulatory plug delays ejaculation by rival males and affects sperm competition outcome in house mice.
Sutter A; Lindholm AK
J Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1617-30. PubMed ID: 27206051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
Deaton R
Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk.
Ramm SA; Stockley P
Behav Ecol; 2014 May; 25(3):660-667. PubMed ID: 24822023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies.
Evans JP
Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 277(1697):3195-201. PubMed ID: 20504807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.
Li MY; Geng ZS; Liao P; Wang XY; Yang TC; Wang JY; Wang DD; Gao LF; Du B
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1851-1859. PubMed ID: 32329064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.
Puurtinen M; Fromhage L
Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Mar; 284(1851):. PubMed ID: 28330914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation.
Kelly CD; Jennions MD
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 Nov; 86(4):863-84. PubMed ID: 21414127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working with what you've got: unattractive males show greater mate-guarding effort in a duetting songbird.
Dowling J; Webster MS
Biol Lett; 2017 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 28077685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misleading mollies: The effect of an audience on the expression of mating preferences.
Plath M; Schlupp I
Commun Integr Biol; 2008; 1(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 19513259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rival male relatedness does not affect ejaculate allocation as predicted by sperm competition theory.
Thomas ML; Simmons LW
PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2151. PubMed ID: 18478102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
