These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38277275)

  • 1. Machine-Learned Potentials by Active Learning from Organic Crystal Structure Prediction Landscapes.
    Butler PWV; Hafizi R; Day GM
    J Phys Chem A; 2024 Feb; 128(5):945-957. PubMed ID: 38277275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multifidelity Statistical Machine Learning for Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction.
    Egorova O; Hafizi R; Woods DC; Day GM
    J Phys Chem A; 2020 Oct; 124(39):8065-8078. PubMed ID: 32881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crystal structure prediction of flexible pharmaceutical-like molecules: density functional tight-binding as an intermediate optimisation method and for free energy estimation.
    Iuzzolino L; McCabe P; Price SL; Brandenburg JG
    Faraday Discuss; 2018 Oct; 211(0):275-296. PubMed ID: 30035288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of structure and properties of molecular crystals from first principles.
    Szalewicz K
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Nov; 47(11):3266-74. PubMed ID: 25354310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crystal structure prediction and isostructurality of three small organic halogen compounds.
    Asmadi A; Kendrick J; Leusen FJ
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Aug; 12(30):8571-9. PubMed ID: 20532368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine-Learned Fragment-Based Energies for Crystal Structure Prediction.
    McDonagh D; Skylaris CK; Day GM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2743-2758. PubMed ID: 30817152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Composite and Low-Cost Approaches for Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction.
    LeBlanc LM; Otero-de-la-Roza A; Johnson ER
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Apr; 14(4):2265-2276. PubMed ID: 29498837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).
    Hafner J
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerated Organic Crystal Structure Prediction with Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning.
    Kadan A; Ryczko K; Wildman A; Wang R; Roitberg A; Yamazaki T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Dec; 19(24):9388-9402. PubMed ID: 38059458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accelerating explicit solvent models of heterogeneous catalysts with machine learning interatomic potentials.
    Chen BWJ; Zhang X; Zhang J
    Chem Sci; 2023 Aug; 14(31):8338-8354. PubMed ID: 37564405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atomistic modeling of the mechanical properties: the rise of machine learning interatomic potentials.
    Mortazavi B; Zhuang X; Rabczuk T; Shapeev AV
    Mater Horiz; 2023 Jun; 10(6):1956-1968. PubMed ID: 37014053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Accurate Can Crystal Structure Predictions Be for High-Energy Molecular Crystals?
    Bidault X; Chaudhuri S
    Molecules; 2023 May; 28(11):. PubMed ID: 37298947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Force-Field Calculations of Lattice Energies on a Large Public Dataset, Assessment of Pharmaceutical Relevance, and Comparison to Density Functional Theory.
    Marchese Robinson RL; Geatches D; Morris C; Mackenzie R; Maloney AGP; Roberts KJ; Moldovan A; Chow E; Pencheva K; Vatvani DRM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4778-4792. PubMed ID: 31638394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliable crystal structure predictions from first principles.
    Nikhar R; Szalewicz K
    Nat Commun; 2022 Jun; 13(1):3095. PubMed ID: 35654882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How evolutionary crystal structure prediction works--and why.
    Oganov AR; Lyakhov AO; Valle M
    Acc Chem Res; 2011 Mar; 44(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 21361336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine Learning Diffusion Monte Carlo Forces.
    Huang C; Rubenstein BM
    J Phys Chem A; 2023 Jan; 127(1):339-355. PubMed ID: 36576803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaussian approximation potentials for accurate thermal properties of two-dimensional materials.
    Kocabaş T; Keçeli M; Vázquez-Mayagoitia Á; Sevik C
    Nanoscale; 2023 May; 15(19):8772-8780. PubMed ID: 37098822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ab Initio Calculations of Free Energy of Activation at Multiple Electronic Structure Levels Made Affordable: An Effective Combination of Perturbation Theory and Machine Learning.
    Bučko T; Gešvandtnerová M; Rocca D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Oct; 16(10):6049-6060. PubMed ID: 32786917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data-efficient machine learning for molecular crystal structure prediction.
    Wengert S; Csányi G; Reuter K; Margraf JT
    Chem Sci; 2021 Feb; 12(12):4536-4546. PubMed ID: 34163719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benchmarking structural evolution methods for training of machine learned interatomic potentials.
    Waters MJ; Rondinelli JM
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2022 Jul; 34(38):. PubMed ID: 35797983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.