115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38277881)
1. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain.
Quass GL; Kral A
Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 443():108953. PubMed ID: 38277881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Level coding by phase duration and asymmetric pulse shape reduce channel interactions in cochlear implants.
Quass GL; Baumhoff P; Gnansia D; Stahl P; Kral A
Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 396():108070. PubMed ID: 32950954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
Snyder RL; Middlebrooks JC; Bonham BH
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
Bierer JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation.
Konerding WS; Baumhoff P; Kral A
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Feb; 24(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 36459250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.
Padilla M; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():98-107. PubMed ID: 26778546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Snel-Bongers J; Böhringer S; Timp GRFM; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.
Srinivasan AG; Padilla M; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():29-36. PubMed ID: 23467170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spread of activation and interaction between channels with multi-channel optogenetic stimulation in the mouse cochlea.
Azees AA; Thompson AC; Thomas R; Zhou J; Ruther P; Wise AK; Ajay EA; Garrett DJ; Quigley A; Fallon JB; Richardson RT
Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 440():108911. PubMed ID: 37977051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forward-masking patterns produced by symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes in electric hearing.
Macherey O; van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Dhooge I; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):326-38. PubMed ID: 20058980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
