124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38278010)
1. PAE planning: Radiation exposure and image quality of CT and CBCT.
Steiniger B; Fiebich M; Grimm MO; Malouhi A; Reichenbach JR; Scheithauer M; Teichgräber U; Franiel T
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111329. PubMed ID: 38278010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro measurements of radiation exposure with different modalities (computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography) for imaging the petrous bone with a pediatric anthropomorphic phantom.
Steiniger B; Lechel U; Reichenbach JR; Fiebich M; Aschenbach R; Schegerer A; Waginger M; Bobeva A; Teichgräber U; Mentzel HJ
Pediatr Radiol; 2022 May; 52(6):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 35460347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.
Cheng HC; Wu VW; Liu ES; Kwong DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 20932676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Koyama S; Aoyama T; Oda N; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4298-306. PubMed ID: 20879590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical note: No increase in effective dose from half compared to full rotation pelvis cone beam CT.
Hauri P; Hälg RA; Schneider U
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):364-368. PubMed ID: 28766828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose estimation for cone-beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy for pelvic cancer using adult mesh-type reference computational phantoms.
Cumur C; Fujibuchi T; Arakawa H; Hamada K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Jun; 16(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 36877400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgivisio® and O-arm®O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: Comparison of patient radiation dose.
Rousseau J; Dreuil S; Bassinet C; Cao S; Elleaume H
Phys Med; 2021 May; 85():192-199. PubMed ID: 34111631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostatic Artery Embolization: Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Radiation Exposure, Procedure Time, and Contrast Media Use.
Bürckenmeyer F; Diamantis I; Kriechenbauer T; Lehmann T; Franiel T; Malouhi A; Grimm MO; Teichgräber U; Aschenbach R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2021 Jul; 44(7):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 33660064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An organ and effective dose study of XVI and OBI cone-beam CT systems.
Hyer DE; Serago CF; Kim S; Li JG; Hintenlang DE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 11(2):3183. PubMed ID: 20592702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Radiation dose evaluation in 3D rotation angiography and cone-beam computed tomography with a flat panel detector].
Seguchi S; Saijou T; Ishikawa Y; Koyama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jul; 70(7):646-52. PubMed ID: 25055944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organ doses and normalized organ doses for various age groups in ultralow dose pediatric C-arm cone-beam CT.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):5790-5798. PubMed ID: 35364713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low dose cone beam CT for paediatric image-guided radiotherapy: Image quality and practical recommendations.
Bryce-Atkinson A; De Jong R; Marchant T; Whitfield G; Aznar MC; Bel A; van Herk M
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Oct; 163():68-75. PubMed ID: 34343544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of coefficients to derive organ and effective doses from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans: a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 29154259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
