186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38278549)
1. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ghaddaf AA; Alsharef JF; Alsharef NK; Alsaegh MH; Alshaban RM; Almutairi AO; Abualola AH; Alshehri MS
Can J Surg; 2024; 67(1):E16-E26. PubMed ID: 38278549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.
Polly DW; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Whang PG; Frank CJ; Harvey CF; Lockstadt H; Glaser JA; Limoni RP; Sembrano JN;
Neurosurgery; 2015 Nov; 77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. PubMed ID: 26291338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.
Rainov NG; Schneiderhan R; Heidecke V
Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 30564865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.
Sturesson B; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Dengler J
Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 27179664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.
Dat KO; Cher D; Polly DW
Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 38081463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
Dengler JD; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Gaetani P; van Eeckhoven E; Cher D; Sturesson B
Pain Physician; 2017 Sep; 20(6):537-550. PubMed ID: 28934785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abbas A; Du JT; Toor J; Versteeg A; Finkelstein JA
Eur Spine J; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2461-2472. PubMed ID: 35768617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Methodology - Minimally Invasive Compared to Screw-Type Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Tran ZV; Ivashchenko A; Brooks L
Pain Physician; 2019 Jan; 22(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 30700066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distraction arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint: 2-year results of a descriptive prospective multi-center cohort study in 171 patients.
Fuchs V; Ruhl B
Eur Spine J; 2018 Jan; 27(1):194-204. PubMed ID: 29058134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.
Polly DW; Swofford J; Whang PG; Frank CJ; Glaser JA; Limoni RP; Cher DJ; Wine KD; Sembrano JN;
Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():28. PubMed ID: 27652199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.
Kasapovic A; Schwetje D; Ali T; Jaenisch M; Gathen M; Bornemann R; Abdallah H; Vieweg U
Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(5):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 35342065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Outcome in Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Pain Originating From the Sacroiliac Joint: A Pooled Analysis.
Dengler J; Duhon B; Whang P; Frank C; Glaser J; Sturesson B; Garfin S; Cher D; Rendahl A; Polly D;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Nov; 42(21):1664-1673. PubMed ID: 28350586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Whang P; Cher D; Polly D; Frank C; Lockstadt H; Glaser J; Limoni R; Sembrano J
Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():6. PubMed ID: 25785242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.
Duhon BS; Bitan F; Lockstadt H; Kovalsky D; Cher D; Hillen T;
Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():13. PubMed ID: 27162715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screws Versus Titanium Triangular Dowels for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Results From a Nonrandomized Prospective Outcome Study.
Agarwal R; Moreau JL; Mohanty K
World Neurosurg; 2024 Apr; 184():e367-e373. PubMed ID: 38307197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hermans SMM; Droeghaag R; Schotanus MGM; Santbrink HV; van Hemert WLW; Curfs I
Int J Spine Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):472-480. PubMed ID: 35772982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Arthrodesis Compared with Conservative Management for Chronic Low Back Pain Attributed to the Sacroiliac Joint.
Dengler J; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Gaetani P; Cher D; Van Eeckhoven E; Annertz M; Sturesson B
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):400-411. PubMed ID: 30845034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.
Chang E; Rains C; Ali R; Wines RC; Kahwati LC
Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1240-1253. PubMed ID: 35017057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical and clinical efficacy of sacroiliac joint fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
Zaidi HA; Montoure AJ; Dickman CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25840040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?
Ledonio CG; Polly DW; Swiontkowski MF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1831-8. PubMed ID: 24519569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
