These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38280038)

  • 1. Deep learning for virtual orthodontic bracket removal: tool establishment and application.
    Li R; Zhu C; Chu F; Yu Q; Fan D; Ouyang N; Jin Y; Guo W; Xia L; Feng Q; Fang B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(1):121. PubMed ID: 38280038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual bracket removal: a comparative assessment of different software packages.
    Gamil H; Marzouk E; Zaher A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jul; 24(1):770. PubMed ID: 38982396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study.
    Chandrasekharan D; Sourabh C; Deenadayalan ; Praveen K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different resin removal methods on enamel after metal and ceramic bracket debonding : An in vitro micro-computed tomography study.
    Cesur E; Arslan C; Orhan AI; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 May; 83(3):157-171. PubMed ID: 34165586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
    Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
    Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new Fluorescence-aided Identification Technique (FIT) for optimal removal of resin-based bracket bonding remnants after orthodontic debracketing.
    Schott TC; Meller C
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(10):809-813. PubMed ID: 30264058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of dental bleaching after bracket bonding and debonding using three different adhesive systems.
    Gomes Lde O; Mathias P; Rizzo P; de Araújo TM; Cangussu MC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 23916433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does clinical experience affect the bracket bonding accuracy of guided bonding devices in vitro?
    Li B; Wang P; Zheng Q; Huang L; Hu S; Han X; Bai D; Xue C
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Jan; 94(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 37503736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement.
    Martin S; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 7977207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: a three-dimensional study.
    Aboujaoude R; Kmeid R; Gebrael C; Amm E
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):31. PubMed ID: 36058991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Particulate production during debonding of fixed appliances: Laboratory investigation and randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of using flash-free ceramic brackets.
    Vig P; Atack NE; Sandy JR; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):767-778. PubMed ID: 31153497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules.
    Saito A; Namura Y; Isokawa K; Shimizu N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Feb; 30(2):869-74. PubMed ID: 24220847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.