These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38280101)

  • 1. The Cochlear Implant "Seatbelt" Technique for Receiver/Stimulator Fixation.
    Elms HL; Del Risco A; Dukes PV; Reed WT; Cunningham CD
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jul; 134(7):3374-3376. PubMed ID: 38280101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of receiver-stimulator migration in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique: a prospective clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Polat B; Enver N; Aydemir L; Çomoğlu Ş; Orhan KS
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):487-491. PubMed ID: 28290917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear Implant Surgery: How to Fix Receiver/Stimulator Avoiding Extrusion.
    Gatto A; Tofanelli M; Piccinato A; Antonio JK; Zucchini S; Achilli VP; Tirelli G
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Jun; 100(3_suppl):212S-214S. PubMed ID: 31597528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.
    Markodimitraki LM; Harkel TCT; Bennink E; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Trials; 2023 Sep; 24(1):605. PubMed ID: 37743463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implant fixation using resorbable mesh.
    Lundy L; Karatayli-Ozgursoy S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2011 Jul; 90(7):306-12. PubMed ID: 21792798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous bone bed formation in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Çelik M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1752-4. PubMed ID: 25025535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implant fixation in children using periosteal sutures.
    Adunka OF; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 17577130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear Implant Receiver-Stimulator Migration Using the Subperiosteal Pocket Technique: Objective Measurements of Early and Late Positioning.
    Maxwell AK; Cass SP
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30742594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of CIR-S using the subperiosteal pocket technique under 2 years of age.
    Cetinkaya EA; Yildiz M; Ensari N; Gokalp Isik U; Yılmaz GO; Aydenizoz D; Selcuk OT; Eyigor H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 34852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study.
    Balkany TJ; Whitley M; Shapira Y; Angeli SI; Brown K; Eter E; Van De Water T; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Treaba C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):903-7. PubMed ID: 19730145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Device fixation and small incision access for pediatric cochlear implants.
    James AL; Papsin BC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 68(8):1017-22. PubMed ID: 15236887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical outcomes with subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation in very young children.
    Cohen MS; Ha AY; Kitsko DJ; Chi DH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Sep; 78(9):1545-7. PubMed ID: 25064628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnet dislodgement in cochlear implantation: correction utilizing a lasso technique.
    Mickelson JI; Kozak FK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1071-6. PubMed ID: 18534692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New bone and fibrous tissue formation around ceramic cochlear implant receiver--stimulators and the measurement of their anchorage in the bony implant bed.
    Mlynski R; Rak K; Kaulitz S; Kraus F; Hagen R; Radeloff A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Nov; 15(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 24972625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-sutured fixation of the internal receiver-stimulator in cochlear implantation.
    Boscolo-Rizzo P; Muzzi E; Barillari MR; Trabalzini F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 268(7):961-5. PubMed ID: 21221619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simplified fixation of the new thin cochlear implant receiver-stimulators in children: long term results with the "back-pocket" technique.
    Cuda D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1158-61. PubMed ID: 23707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.