156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38281028)
1. Evaluation of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in skeletal class III subjects with different vertical patterns using cone beam computed tomography.
Huang X; Huang W; Pei T; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y; Bai X
Head Face Med; 2024 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 38281028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns.
Huang X; Hu X; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32066451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.
Chen H; Liu Z; Hu X; Wu B; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33952217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Basal and dentoalveolar transverse parameters in different sagittal and vertical malocclusions in adults: a comparative study.
Abdulghani EA; Al-Sosowa AA; Alhashimi N; Cao B; Zheng W; Li Y; Alhammadi MS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Apr; 28(5):276. PubMed ID: 38668916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the relationship between the morphology of the palate and facial skeletal patterns in Class III malocclusion using structural equation modelling.
Ahn MS; Shin SM; Choi YS; Wu TJ; Ko CC; Yamaguchi T; Maki K; Kim YI
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 30633439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation of Vertical Dentoalveolar Heights with Palatal Plane Inclination in Adults with Different Vertical Facial Patterns].
Farhat Z; Osman E; Kassem H; Bouserhal J
Orthod Fr; 2022 Dec; 93(4):321-331. PubMed ID: 36718754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study.
Reis AS; Copello FM; de Castro ACR; Cevidanes LHS; do Rego MV; Visconti MA; Ruellas ACO
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):687-694. PubMed ID: 37246594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability associated with maxillary infrazygomatic crest and palatal bone width, height, and angulation in subjects with different vertical facial growth types: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.
Patel B; De Rose J; Nash J; Sekula M; Gioia C; Deguchi T; Gudhimella S; Gandhi V
Angle Orthod; 2024 May; 94(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 38195059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Size of the Condyle in Vertical and Anteroposterior Skeletal Conditions with the Help of Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Jyotirmay ; Singh SK; Adarsh K; Sinha A; Kumar A; Sharan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 34257181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal Class II pattern.
Nair R; Deguchi TS; Li X; Katashiba S; Chan YH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19154269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of mandibular volume classified by vertical skeletal dimensions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Nakawaki T; Yamaguchi T; Tomita D; Hikita Y; Adel M; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2016 Nov; 86(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 27007754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study.
Casanova-Sarmiento JA; Arriola-Guillén LE; Ruíz-Mora GA; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 31735681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.
Olbrisch C; Santander P; Moser N; Klenke D; Meyer-Marcotty P; Quast A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Mar; 85(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 36018344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Chen W; Zhang K; Liu D
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33752663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study.
Ma Q; Bimal P; Mei L; Olliver S; Farella M; Li H
J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Jul; 149(7):589-598. PubMed ID: 29655707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in Class II growing subjects.
Paoloni V; Lione R; Farisco F; Halazonetis DJ; Franchi L; Cozza P
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):371-376. PubMed ID: 28340178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the palatal bone in different facial patterns for orthodontic mini-implants insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Vidalón JA; Liñan C; Tay LY; Meneses A; Lagravère M
Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(1):e2119204. PubMed ID: 33759963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
Zhou J; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
