These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38284359)
1. The Right-Ear Advantage in Static and Dynamic Cocktail-Party Situations. Wächtler M; Sandmann P; Meister H Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165231215916. PubMed ID: 38284359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static and dynamic cocktail party listening in younger and older adults. Meister H; Wenzel F; Gehlen AK; Kessler J; Walger M Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108020. PubMed ID: 32698114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses. Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221111676. PubMed ID: 35849353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited. Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Costs of dynamic cocktail party listening: Investigating the effects of cognitive abilities and hearing impairment. Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H JASA Express Lett; 2021 Jul; 1(7):075201. PubMed ID: 36154643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations. Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention. Koelewijn T; de Kluiver H; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation of the dichotic right ear advantage during bilateral but not unilateral transcranial random noise stimulation. Prete G; D'Anselmo A; Tommasi L; Brancucci A Brain Cogn; 2018 Jun; 123():81-88. PubMed ID: 29547746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Concurrent OLSA Test: A Method for Speech Recognition in Multi-talker Situations at Fixed SNR. Heeren J; Nuesse T; Latzel M; Holube I; Hohmann V; Wagener KC; Schulte M Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221108257. PubMed ID: 35702051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants. Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task. Brungart DS; Simpson BD J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2985-95. PubMed ID: 12509020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of working memory in dichotic-listening studies of auditory laterality. Penner IK; Schläfli K; Opwis K; Hugdahl K J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 31(8):959-66. PubMed ID: 19358008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Tallus J; Hugdahl K; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():195-200. PubMed ID: 17920571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ). Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]