BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38284961)

  • 1. Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT.
    Huiskes M; Kong W; Oud M; Crama K; Rasch C; Breedveld S; Heijmen B; Astreinidou E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Jul; 119(3):968-977. PubMed ID: 38284961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated Robust Planning for IMPT in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning.
    van Bruggen IG; Huiskes M; de Vette SPM; Holmström M; Langendijk JA; Both S; Kierkels RGJ; Korevaar EW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1283-1290. PubMed ID: 36535432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.
    Rojo-Santiago J; Korevaar E; Perkó Z; Both S; Habraken SJM; Hoogeman MS
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Sep; 186():109729. PubMed ID: 37301261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
    de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
    Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
    Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
    Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study.
    Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Fransen D; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 22658513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
    Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
    Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
    Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated Robust Proton Planning Using Dose-Volume Histogram-Based Mimicking of the Photon Reference Dose and Reducing Organ at Risk Dose Optimization.
    Kierkels RGJ; Fredriksson A; Both S; Langendijk JA; Scandurra D; Korevaar EW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jan; 103(1):251-258. PubMed ID: 30145392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
    Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
    Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
    Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes.
    Stützer K; Jakobi A; Bandurska-Luque A; Barczyk S; Arnsmeyer C; Löck S; Richter C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):104-113. PubMed ID: 28921843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the utilization of beam-specific apertures for the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer plans.
    Rana S; Storey M; Manthala Padannayil N; Shamurailatpam DS; Bennouna J; George J; Chang J
    Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):e7-e11. PubMed ID: 33246881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Hung HM; Chan OCM; Mak CH; Hung WM; Ng WT; Lee MCH
    Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 34470708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.