These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38286064)
21. Consumer-based activity trackers in evaluation of physical activity in myositis patients. Saygin D; Rockette-Wagner B; Oddis C; Neiman N; Koontz D; Moghadam-Kia S; Aggarwal R Rheumatology (Oxford); 2022 Jul; 61(7):2951-2958. PubMed ID: 34528065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the Wrist-Worn Fitbit Charge 2 and the Waist-Worn Actigraph GTX3 for Measuring Steps Taken in Occupational Settings. Garza JL; Wu ZH; Singh M; Cherniack MG Ann Work Expo Health; 2022 Feb; 66(2):281-284. PubMed ID: 34383020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. Sasaki JE; Hickey A; Mavilia M; Tedesco J; John D; Kozey Keadle S; Freedson PS J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24770438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validity of Activity Trackers in Estimating Energy Expenditure During High-Intensity Functional Training. Morris CE; Wessel PA; Tinius RA; Schafer MA; Maples JM Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Sep; 90(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 31046630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study. Degroote L; Hamerlinck G; Poels K; Maher C; Crombez G; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Vandendriessche A; Curtis RG; DeSmet A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16674. PubMed ID: 32282332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of energy expenditure estimation of several physical activity monitors. Dannecker KL; Sazonova NA; Melanson EL; Sazonov ES; Browning RC Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Nov; 45(11):2105-12. PubMed ID: 23669877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validity of wearable activity monitors for tracking steps and estimating energy expenditure during a graded maximal treadmill test. Kendall B; Bellovary B; Gothe NP J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29863968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the Fitbit Charge 2 compared to the ActiGraph GT3X+ in older adults with knee osteoarthritis in free-living conditions. Collins JE; Yang HY; Trentadue TP; Gong Y; Losina E PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211231. PubMed ID: 30699159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Agreement between the Apple Series 1, LifeTrak Core C200, and Fitbit Charge HR with Indirect Calorimetry for Assessing Treadmill Energy Expenditure. Zhang P; Burns RD; Fu Y; Godin S; Byun W Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31658628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE FITBIT FLEX™ AND ACTIGRAPH GT3X+ AT JOGGING AND RUNNING SPEEDS. Jones D; Crossley K; Dascombe B; Hart HF; Kemp J Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 13(5):860-870. PubMed ID: 30276018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Four Commercial Activity Trackers' Step Counting Performance. Tophøj KH; Petersen MG; Sæbye C; Baad-Hansen T; Wagner S Telemed J E Health; 2018 Sep; 24(9):669-677. PubMed ID: 29303680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study. Herkert C; Kraal JJ; van Loon EMA; van Hooff M; Kemps HMC JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e15045. PubMed ID: 31855191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reliability and Validity of Ten Consumer Activity Trackers Depend on Walking Speed. Fokkema T; Kooiman TJ; Krijnen WP; VAN DER Schans CP; DE Groot M Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 28319983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. Takacs J; Pollock CL; Guenther JR; Bahar M; Napier C; Hunt MA J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24268570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types. Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validity of Commercial Activity Trackers in Children With Congenital Heart Disease. Voss C; Gardner RF; Dean PH; Harris KC Can J Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 33(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 28347581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]