These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38286218)

  • 1. Single scanning of CBCT and intraoral scanning for guided implantation in terminal dentitions with multi-unit metal restorations: technical note.
    Rong R; Lv H; Sa Y
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jan; 125(6):101784. PubMed ID: 38286218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides.
    Flügge T; Derksen W; Te Poel J; Hassan B; Nelson K; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 27440381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The in-vitro accuracy of fiducial marker-based versus markerless registration of an intraoral scan with a cone-beam computed tomography scan in the presence of restoration artifact.
    Biun J; Dudhia R; Arora H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1257-1266. PubMed ID: 37602506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiopaque fiducial markers as an aid to fabrication of an implant surgical guide for a patient with orthodontic brackets: A dental technique.
    Lv HX; Rong R; Sa Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):835-839. PubMed ID: 34556334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Novel Digital Implant Planning Workflow in Patients with Preexisting Metal Restorations: A Technical Report.
    Ballo AM; Sim JW
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Aug; 30(7):632-635. PubMed ID: 33900660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superimposing digital arch scans onto cone beam computed tomography scans with metallic artifacts by applying a radiopaque occlusal registration material: A chairside dental technique.
    Yang S; Li J; Yuan Q; Yue L; Wei C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38806339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital Workflow to Merge an Intraoral Scan and CBCT of Edentulous Maxilla: A Technical Report.
    Carosi P; Ferrigno N; De Renzi G; Laureti M
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):730-732. PubMed ID: 32608078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital versus radiographic accuracy evaluation of guided implant surgery: an in vitro study.
    Yi C; Li S; Wen A; Wang Y; Zhao Y; Zhang Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36424579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of accuracy between single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer guided implant surgery and a digital laser printed surgical guide: A clinical investigation.
    Mittal S; Kaurani P; Goyal R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38218708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study.
    Derksen W; Wismeijer D; Flügge T; Hassan B; Tahmaseb A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 31330566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital Implant Planning and Surgical Guides: Tools for Clinical Success.
    Conejo J; Atria PJ; Schweitzer D; Blatz MB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2021; 42(7):400-401. PubMed ID: 34297595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and dimensional reproducibility by model scanning, intraoral scanning, and CBCT imaging for digital implant dentistry.
    Komuro A; Yamada Y; Uesugi S; Terashima H; Kimura M; Kishimoto H; Iida T; Sakamoto K; Okuda K; Kusano K; Baba S; Sakamoto T
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jun; 7(1):63. PubMed ID: 34189641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of IOS in Full-Arch Dentate Patients Compared to CBCT Cast-Scanning. An In-Vivo Study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Pavlakis E; Kourakis G; Papavasiliou G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Aug; 27(3):122-130. PubMed ID: 31433136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoral Scanning as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placements in Partially Edentate Situations: A Prospective Clinical Case Series.
    van Hooft J; Kielenstijn G; Liebregts J; Baan F; Meijer G; D'haese J; Bronkhorst E; Verhamme L
    J Clin Med; 2022 Oct; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36233744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System Workflow for Implant Supported Full Arch Prosthesis: A Case Series.
    Stefanelli LV; Mandelaris GA; Franchina A; Pranno N; Pagliarulo M; Cera F; Maltese F; Angelis F; Carlo SD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32668790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A chairside digital radiographic guide for registering digital casts to cone beam computed tomography scans with strong metallic artifacts.
    Wu Q; Wu J; Tan Y; Sun J; Yu H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36610844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of postoperative intraoral scan versus cone beam computerised tomography to measure accuracy of guided implant placement-A prospective clinical study.
    Skjerven H; Olsen-Bergem H; Rønold HJ; Riis UH; Ellingsen JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):531-541. PubMed ID: 31002415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.