These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38287399)
1. Methods for meta-analysis and meta-regression of binomial data: concepts and tutorial with Stata command metapreg. Nyaga VN; Arbyn M Arch Public Health; 2024 Jan; 82(1):14. PubMed ID: 38287399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Nyaga VN; Arbyn M; Aerts M Arch Public Health; 2014; 72(1):39. PubMed ID: 25810908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metadta: a Stata command for meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic test accuracy data - a tutorial. Nyaga VN; Arbyn M Arch Public Health; 2022 Mar; 80(1):95. PubMed ID: 35351195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and validation of metadta for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Nyaga VN; Arbyn M Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):544-562. PubMed ID: 36999350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple method for combining binomial counts or proportions with hazard ratios for evidence synthesis of time-to-event data. Watkins C; Bennett I Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29707913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis in Stata using gllamm. Bagos PG Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):310-32. PubMed ID: 26612788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beta-binomial analysis of variance model for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data. N Nyaga V; Arbyn M; Aerts M Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2554-2566. PubMed ID: 29984635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of methods for the analysis of binomial clustered outcomes in behavioral research. Ferrari A; Comelli M J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Dec; 274():131-140. PubMed ID: 27751892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach. Chen Y; Hong C; Ning Y; Su X Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 26303591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies. Felsch M; Beckmann L; Bender R; Kuss O; Skipka G; Mathes T BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):319. PubMed ID: 36514000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dias S; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Welton NJ Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):607-17. PubMed ID: 23104435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of Proportions of Rare Events-A Comparison of Exact Likelihood Methods with Robust Variance Estimation. Ma Y; Chu H; Mazumdar M Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2016; 45(8):3036-3052. PubMed ID: 27605731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random-effects meta-analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data-generating models: A simulation study. Jansen K; Holling H Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200132. PubMed ID: 36216590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitfalls of using the risk ratio in meta-analysis. Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):398-419. PubMed ID: 30854785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]