144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38288316)
1. [Validity of digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant bone defects:
Elera Morales CC; Castro Ruiz CT
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2023; 11(1):e141. PubMed ID: 38288316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: An in vitro study.
Pelekos G; Tse JMN; Ho D; Tonetti MS
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 31536645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peri-implant assessment via cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography: an ex vivo study.
Silveira-Neto N; Flores ME; De Carli JP; Costa MD; Matos FS; Paranhos LR; Linden MSS
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 Nov; 72(11):708-713. PubMed ID: 29236918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review.
Costa JA; Mendes JM; Salazar F; Pacheco JJ; Rompante P; Câmara MI
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 37058184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and inter-observer agreements in detecting peri-implant bone defects between periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: A clinical study.
Zhang CN; Zhu Y; Fan LF; Zhang X; Jiang YH; Gu YX
J Dent Sci; 2021 Jul; 16(3):948-956. PubMed ID: 34141109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of peri-implant bone defects on cone-beam computed tomography and the diagnostic accuracy of detecting these defects on panoramic images.
Oshima T; Asaumi R; Ogura S; Kawai T
Imaging Sci Dent; 2024 Jun; 54(2):171-180. PubMed ID: 38948187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Periapical Radiography and Three Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Systems for Detection of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: An in- Vitro Study.
V A; A E; S S; M R J; Gholi Mezerji N M
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2020 Dec; 10(6):751-760. PubMed ID: 33364213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of peri-implant bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography with parallel and oblique projection.
Vadiati Saberi B; Khosravifard N; Ghandari F; Hadinezhad A
Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Dec; 49(4):265-272. PubMed ID: 31915611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
Eskandarloo A; Saati S; Ardakani MP; Jamalpour M; Gholi Mezerji NM; Akheshteh V
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Pinheiro LR; Gaia BF; Oliveira de Sales MA; Umetsubo OS; Santos Junior O; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral digital radiography for assessment of tooth root lesions.
Kumar V; Gossett L; Blattner A; Iwasaki LR; Williams K; Nickel JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e533-41. PubMed ID: 21640865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography with modified gray-scale range versus digital periapical radiography for the assessment of bone-implant interface gaps.
Kajan ZD; Abbasi S; Khosravifard N; Sigaroudi AK; Motevasseli S
Oral Radiol; 2022 Jan; 38(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33893899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
