These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38289026)

  • 41. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Permutation inference for the general linear model.
    Winkler AM; Ridgway GR; Webster MA; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92(100):381-97. PubMed ID: 24530839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The one-way ANOVA test explained.
    Chatzi A; Doody O
    Nurse Res; 2023 Sep; 31(3):8-14. PubMed ID: 37317616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1994 Sep; 21(9):673-86. PubMed ID: 7820947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Null but not void: considerations for hypothesis testing.
    Shaw PA; Proschan MA
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 22807023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Omnibus permutation tests of the overall null hypothesis in datasets with many covariates.
    Potter DM; Griffiths DJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):327-41. PubMed ID: 16724488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Defining components of the research process needed to conduct and critique studies.
    Summers S
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1991 Feb; 6(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 2046040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Permutation/randomization-based inference for environmental data.
    Spicer RC; Gangloff HJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Mar; 188(3):147. PubMed ID: 26850713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Parallelized calculation of permutation tests.
    Ekvall M; Höhle M; Käll L
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 36(22-23):5392-5397. PubMed ID: 33289531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An adaptive permutation approach for genome-wide association study: evaluation and recommendations for use.
    Che R; Jack JR; Motsinger-Reif AA; Brown CC
    BioData Min; 2014; 7():9. PubMed ID: 24976866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pervasive errors in hypothesis testing: Toward better statistical practice in nursing research.
    Staggs VS
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Oct; 98():87-93. PubMed ID: 31349121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Multivariate tests of means in independent groups designs. Effects of covariance heterogeneity and nonnormality.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 14994559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Trends in Mediation Analysis in Nursing Research: Improving Current Practice.
    Hertzog M
    West J Nurs Res; 2018 Jun; 40(6):907-930. PubMed ID: 28322652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. swpermute: Permutation tests for Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomised Trials.
    Thompson J; Davey C; Hayes R; Hargreaves J; Fielding K
    Stata J; 2019 Dec; 19(4):803-819. PubMed ID: 32565746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Permutation tests for factorially designed neuroimaging experiments.
    Suckling J; Bullmore E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Jul; 22(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 15195286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The significance of statistical significance.
    Dyer I
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1997 Oct; 13(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 9538712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Permutations of functional magnetic resonance imaging classification may not be normally distributed.
    Al-Rawi MS; Freitas A; Duarte JV; Cunha JP; Castelo-Branco M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2567-2585. PubMed ID: 29251253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Statistical process control in nursing research.
    Polit DF; Chaboyer W
    Res Nurs Health; 2012 Feb; 35(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 22095634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analysis of quantitative research data: Part 2.
    Banks S
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Jul; 14(10):710-3. PubMed ID: 10481722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.