These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38289160)

  • 1. Assessment of Radiation Doses to the General Public around Nuclear Power Plants Based on Representative Person Concept.
    Kim KH; Seo HS; Jin YH; Kim KP
    Health Phys; 2024 Apr; 126(4):196-206. PubMed ID: 38289160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Derivation of dose constraint for the general public around nuclear power plants with operational data of radioactive effluent releases.
    Jin YH; Kim JW; Kim HJ; Kim KP
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Oct; 200():110985. PubMed ID: 37598561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing dose of the representative person for the purpose of radiation protection of the public. ICRP publication 101. Approved by the Commission in September 2005.
    ICRP
    Ann ICRP; 2006; 36(3):vii-viii, 5-62. PubMed ID: 17174713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation dose distribution for workers in South Korean nuclear power plants.
    Lee BI; Kim SI; Suh DH; Jin YW; Kim JI; Choi H; Lim YK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 20223854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological safety assessment for transportation of reactor pressure vessel during decommissioning of a nuclear power plant in Korea.
    Kwak M; Kim HJ; Oh GE; Shin SW; Kim KP
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Mar; 44(1):. PubMed ID: 38507784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A STUDY OF A DOSE CONSTRAINT FOR OCCUPATIONALLY EXPOSED WORKERS IN THE US NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS.
    Kong TY; Akabani G; Poston JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):502-512. PubMed ID: 30260433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of individual radiation doses in residents living around the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.
    Nagataki S; Takamura N; Kamiya K; Akashi M
    Radiat Res; 2013 Nov; 180(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 24131040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of resident doses near nuclear power plants in Taiwan for epidemiology study.
    Lee SC; Pan CY; Lai PC; Lee TA; Wu WT; Chang SL; Tung CJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2020 Dec; 225():106443. PubMed ID: 33065429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiological Dose Assessment to Members of the Public Using Consumer Products Containing Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials in Korea.
    Joseph SR; Kim J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of the most appropriate two-dosemeter algorithm for estimating effective dose equivalent during maintenance periods in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Kim HG; Kong TY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 20203124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public member dose assessment of Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant under normal operation by modeling the fallout from stack using the HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion model.
    Zali A; Shamsaei Zafarghandi M; Feghhi SA; Taherian AM
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 May; 171():1-8. PubMed ID: 28160701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current concentration of artificial radionuclides and estimated radiation doses from 137Cs around the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Testing Site, and in Nagasaki.
    Taira Y; Hayashida N; Brahmanandhan GM; Nagayama Y; Yamashita S; Takahashi J; Gutevitc A; Kazlovsky A; Urazalin M; Takamura N
    J Radiat Res; 2011; 52(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21187665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current status of radiological protection at nuclear power stations in Japan.
    Suzuki A; Hori S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):343-6. PubMed ID: 21525040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Work to save dose: contrasting effective dose rates from radon exposure in workplaces and residences against the backdrop of public and occupational regulatory limits.
    Whicker JJ; McNaughton MW
    Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 19667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the possible radiological impact of routine radiological discharges from proposed nuclear power stations in England and Wales.
    Jones A; Jones K; Holmes S; Ewers L; Cabianca T
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 23295273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation fields and dose assessments in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Kim HG; Kong TY; Jeong WT; Kim ST
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):136-9. PubMed ID: 21498858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry experiences and lessons learned for radiation dose assessment in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Choi JR; Kim HG; Kong TY; Son JK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 23204558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study Protocol for Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risk Assessment: The Taiwan Nuclear Power Plants and Epidemiology Cohort Study (TNPECS).
    Wu WT; Pan CY; Chang SL; Chen YH; Tung CJ; Lin P
    J Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 34053962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
    Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.