These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38289451)
1. Fracture strength of endocrowns after thermomechanical aging. Dikici B; Can E; Türkeş Başaran E; Barut G; Dönmez N Odontology; 2024 Jul; 112(3):884-894. PubMed ID: 38289451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Kanat-Ertürk B; Saridağ S; Köseler E; Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D; Avcu E; Yildiran-Avcu Y Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 29311428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD CAM Endocrowns made of feldspathic ceramic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate: A two-year mixed cohort study. Jalali S; Asgari N; Pirooz P; Younespour S; Atri F J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105019. PubMed ID: 38670333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review. AlHelal AA J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of material thickness on fractural strength of CAD/CAM fabricated ceramic crowns. Zimmermann M; Egli G; Zaruba M; Mehl A Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 28835598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading. El Ghoul W; Özcan M; Silwadi M; Salameh Z J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31067007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of retention and fracture load of endocrowns made from zirconia and zirconium lithium silicate after aging: an in vitro study. Sahebi M; Ghodsi S; Berahman P; Amini A; Zeighami S BMC Oral Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 35172792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of feldspathic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD/CAM endocrowns for maxillary premolars. Saglam G; Cengiz S; Karacaer O Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31929199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. Taha D; Spintzyk S; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jul; 30(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 30113129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of surface treatments on bond durability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics: An in vitro study. Wang Y; Hui R; Gao L; Ma Y; Wu X; Meng Y; Hao Z J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1350.e1-1350.e10. PubMed ID: 36328823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars. Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments. Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different preparation designs and all ceramic materials on fracture strength of molar endocrowns. Haralur SB; Alamrey AA; Alshehri SA; Alzahrani DS; Alfarsi M J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020947329. PubMed ID: 33151780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory Performance of Universal Adhesive Systems for Luting CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. Siqueira F; Cardenas AM; Gutierrez MF; Malaquias P; Hass V; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27419246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue. Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns. Gregor L; Bouillaguet S; Onisor I; Ardu S; Krejci I; Rocca GT J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):942-8. PubMed ID: 24767899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]