These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38291309)

  • 41. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Gulbinaite R; Johnson A; de Jong R; Morey CC; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():197-206. PubMed ID: 24878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Yurgil KA; Golob EJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1263-74. PubMed ID: 24016201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Individual differences in working-memory capacity and task resumption following interruptions.
    Foroughi CK; Werner NE; McKendrick R; Cades DM; Boehm-Davis DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1480-8. PubMed ID: 26882286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.
    Kane MJ; Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Gross GM; Chun CA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Aug; 145(8):1017-1048. PubMed ID: 27454042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Neural mechanisms of internal distraction suppression in visual attention.
    Rajan A; Meyyappan S; Walker H; Henry Samuel IB; Hu Z; Ding M
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():77-88. PubMed ID: 30933692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Social exclusion modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs.
    Xu M; Li Z; Qi S; Fan L; Zhou X; Yang D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jul; 41(10):2669-2685. PubMed ID: 32491264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Working memory capacity preferentially enhances implementation of proactive control.
    Lin Y; Brough RE; Tay A; Jackson JJ; Braver TS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Feb; 50(2):287-305. PubMed ID: 36326650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict action monitoring and the error-related negativity.
    Miller AE; Watson JM; Strayer DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 22250911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching.
    Pettigrew C; Martin RC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; 69(12):2431-2451. PubMed ID: 26594895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatiotemporal brain signal associated with high and low levels of proactive motor response inhibition.
    Brevers D; Cheron G; Dahman T; Petieau M; Palmero-Soler E; Foucart J; Verbanck P; Cebolla AM
    Brain Res; 2020 Nov; 1747():147064. PubMed ID: 32818530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Jointly modeling behavioral and EEG measures of proactive control in task switching.
    Karayanidis F; Hawkins GE; Wong ASW; Aziz F; Hunter M; Steyvers M
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Jul; 60(7):e14241. PubMed ID: 36633198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact of working memory capacity on predominance of parietal over frontal P300 amplitude.
    Guerrero L; Bouazzaoui B; Isingrini M; Angel L
    Brain Cogn; 2023 Aug; 170():106056. PubMed ID: 37339547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Adaptiveness in proactive control engagement in children and adults.
    Chevalier N; Meaney JA; Traut HJ; Munakata Y
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 46():100870. PubMed ID: 33120165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Working memory capacity is related to variations in the magnitude of an electrophysiological marker of recollection.
    Elward RL; Wilding EL
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1342():55-62. PubMed ID: 20423706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Age-related differences in working memory: ERPs reveal age-related delays in selection- and inhibition-related processes.
    Yi Y; Friedman D
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(4):483-513. PubMed ID: 24015921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Increased distractibility in schizotypy: Independent of individual differences in working memory capacity?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Sörqvist P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):565-578. PubMed ID: 27028661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.