These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38293499)

  • 1. On SIR-based MCDM approach: Selecting a charcoal firm using hybrid fuzzy number on a Triple Vague structure.
    Rajadurai M; Kaliyaperumal P
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24248. PubMed ID: 38293499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.
    Sultan A; Sałabun W; Faizi S; Ismail M; Shekhovtsov A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection.
    Gong JW; Liu HC; You XY; Yin L
    Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Apr; 102():107118. PubMed ID: 36570416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of the new easy approach to fuzzy multi-criteria decision aid in the field of management.
    Ziemba P
    MethodsX; 2021; 8():101344. PubMed ID: 34430248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Digital Technology Strategies in COVID-19 Pandemic Under Uncertainty.
    Salimian S; Mousavi SM
    Arab J Sci Eng; 2023; 48(5):7005-7017. PubMed ID: 36090763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An extension of the best-worst method based on the spherical fuzzy sets for multi-criteria decision-making.
    Haseli G; Sheikh R; Ghoushchi SJ; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M; Moslem S; Deveci M; Kadry S
    Granul Comput; 2024; 9(2):40. PubMed ID: 38585422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel extension of Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for new product development.
    Göçer F; Büyüközkan G
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16726. PubMed ID: 37292298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative approach for ranking contaminated sites based on the risk assessment paradigm using fuzzy PROMETHEE.
    Zhang K; Kluck C; Achari G
    Environ Manage; 2009 Nov; 44(5):952-67. PubMed ID: 19763684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets.
    Ma Q; Sun H; Chen Z; Tan Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294596. PubMed ID: 38011124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling uncertainties with TOPSIS and GRA based on q-rung orthopair m-polar fuzzy soft information in COVID-19.
    Riaz M; Garg H; Hamid MT; Afzal D
    Expert Syst; 2022 Jun; 39(5):e12940. PubMed ID: 35599851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Green Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Artificial Neural Networks.
    Gegovska T; Koker R; Cakar T
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8811834. PubMed ID: 33082775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicriteria decision-making approach with hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets.
    Peng JJ; Wang JQ; Wang J; Chen XH
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():868515. PubMed ID: 24983009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.
    Menekse A; Ertemel AV; Camgoz Akdag H; Gorener A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282676. PubMed ID: 36893100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A PROMETHEE based outranking approach for the construction of Fangcang shelter hospital using spherical fuzzy sets.
    Akram M; Zahid K; Kahraman C
    Artif Intell Med; 2023 Jan; 135():102456. PubMed ID: 36628791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review.
    Alsalem MA; Alamoodi AH; Albahri OS; Dawood KA; Mohammed RT; Alnoor A; Zaidan AA; Albahri AS; Zaidan BB; Jumaah FM; Al-Obaidi JR
    Artif Intell Rev; 2022; 55(6):4979-5062. PubMed ID: 35103030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection of suitable biomass conservation process techniques: a versatile approach to normal wiggly interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set using multi-criteria decision making.
    Narayanamoorthy S; Ramya L; Gunasekaran A; Kalaiselvan S; Kang D
    Complex Intell Systems; 2023 May; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 37361965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.
    Sotoudeh-Anvari A
    Appl Soft Comput; 2022 Sep; 126():109238. PubMed ID: 35795407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.