These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38293709)

  • 1. Maxillary morphology of chimpanzees: Captive versus wild environments.
    Hanegraef H; Spoor F
    J Anat; 2024 Jun; 244(6):977-994. PubMed ID: 38293709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Berge C; Penin X
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the Function of Mutual Grooming in Captive Bonobos (Pan paniscus) and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Allanic M; Hayashi M; Matsuzawa T
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 2020; 91(5):481-494. PubMed ID: 32229727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social grooming network in captive chimpanzees: does the wild or captive origin of group members affect sociality?
    Levé M; Sueur C; Petit O; Matsuzawa T; Hirata S
    Primates; 2016 Jan; 57(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 26403665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Lieberman DE; Carlo J; Ponce de León M; Zollikofer CP
    J Hum Evol; 2007 Jun; 52(6):647-62. PubMed ID: 17298840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative social grooming networks in captive chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Rodrigues MA; Boeving ER
    Primates; 2019 May; 60(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 29931656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Within arm's reach: Measuring forearm length to assess growth patterns in captive bonobos and chimpanzees.
    Behringer V; Stevens JM; Kivell TL; Neufuss J; Boesch C; Hohmann G
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Sep; 161(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 27143225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brief communication: Morphological effects of captivity: A geometric morphometric analysis of the dorsal side of the scapula in captive-bred and wild-caught Hominoidea.
    Bello-Hellegouarch G; Potau JM; Arias-Martorell J; Pastor JF; Pérez-Pérez A
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Oct; 152(2):306-10. PubMed ID: 23999861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of captive versus wild rearing environments on long bone articular surfaces in common chimpanzees (
    Lewton KL
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3668. PubMed ID: 28828263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring femoral diaphyseal shape variation in wild and captive chimpanzees by means of morphometric mapping: a test of Wolff's law.
    Morimoto N; Ponce de León MS; Zollikofer CP
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Apr; 294(4):589-609. PubMed ID: 21328564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the Giles hypothesis using geometric morphometrics.
    Simons EA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 Apr; 174(4):744-751. PubMed ID: 33393687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long bone diaphyseal shape follows different ontogenetic trajectories in captive and wild gorillas.
    Canington SL; Sylvester AD; Burgess ML; Junno JA; Ruff CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Oct; 167(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30159891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing thoraco-pelvic covariation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes: A 3D geometric morphometric approach.
    Torres-Tamayo N; Martelli S; Schlager S; García-Martínez D; Sanchis-Gimeno JA; Mata-Escolano F; Nalla S; Ogihara N; Oishi M; Bastir M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Nov; 173(3):514-534. PubMed ID: 32864759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A survey of entodiniomorphid ciliates in chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Pomajbíková K; Petrzelková KJ; Profousová I; Petrásová J; Kisidayová S; Varádyová Z; Modrý D
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 May; 142(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19845028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ontogenetic study of allometric variation in Homo and Pan mandibles.
    Singh N
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2014 Feb; 297(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 24347386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal development in Pan paniscus with comparisons to Pan troglodytes.
    Bolter DR; Zihlman AL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Apr; 147(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 22331605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body mass and growth rates in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) cared for in African wildlife sanctuaries, zoological institutions, and research facilities.
    Curry BA; Drane AL; Atencia R; Feltrer Y; Howatson G; Calvi T; Palmer C; Moittie S; Unwin S; Tremblay JC; Sleeper MM; Lammey ML; Cooper S; Stembridge M; Shave R
    Zoo Biol; 2023 Jan; 42(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 35815730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The three-dimensional morphological effects of captivity.
    Hartstone-Rose A; Selvey H; Villari JR; Atwell M; Schmidt T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113437. PubMed ID: 25409498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does group size matter? Captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) behavior as a function of group size and composition.
    Neal Webb SJ; Hau J; Schapiro SJ
    Am J Primatol; 2019 Jan; 81(1):e22947. PubMed ID: 30620093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.