These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38294654)
1. Optimizing slug bubble size for application of the ultra-thin flat sheet membranes in MBR: a comprehensive study combining CFD simulation and experiment. Wu X; Yang L; Chang J; Dong S; Xiao F Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(10):15322-15338. PubMed ID: 38294654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of MBR hydrodynamics for cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM design. Yang M; Yu D; Liu M; Zheng L; Zheng X; Wei Y; Wang F; Fan Y Bioresour Technol; 2017 Mar; 227():102-111. PubMed ID: 28013126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior performance of a membrane bioreactor through innovative in-situ aeration and structural optimization using computational fluid dynamics. Shen L; Wu Q; Ye Q; Lin H; Zhang J; Chen C; Yue R; Teng J; Hong H; Liao BQ Water Res; 2023 Sep; 243():120353. PubMed ID: 37482001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aerobic granular sludge (AGS) scouring to mitigate membrane fouling: Performance, hydrodynamic mechanism and contribution quantification model. Zhang W; Liang W; Zhang Z; Hao T Water Res; 2021 Jan; 188():116518. PubMed ID: 33137525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CFD simulation of the aeration process and baffle influence in a full-scale commercial flat sheet module. Cao Y; Gu B; Sonnenburg A; Urban W Water Sci Technol; 2020 May; 81(9):2004-2010. PubMed ID: 32666953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrodynamic effects of air sparging on hollow fiber membranes in a bubble column reactor. Xia L; Law AW; Fane AG Water Res; 2013 Jul; 47(11):3762-72. PubMed ID: 23726713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater. Nywening JP; Zhou H Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Numerical and experimental investigation for cleaning process of submerged outside-in hollow fiber membrane. Guo X; Wang Y; Zhang H; Li P; Ma C Water Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 76(5-6):1283-1299. PubMed ID: 28953455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydraulic optimization of membrane bioreactor via baffle modification using computational fluid dynamics. Yan X; Xiao K; Liang S; Lei T; Liang P; Xue T; Yu K; Guan J; Huang X Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jan; 175():633-7. PubMed ID: 25465790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periodic fouling control strategies in gravity-driven membrane bioreactors (GD-MBRs): Impact on treatment performance and membrane fouling properties. Ranieri L; Vrouwenvelder JS; Fortunato L Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 3):156340. PubMed ID: 35654208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impacts of micron-sized aeration bubble on sludge properties and hydraulic dynamics in relation to membrane fouling alleviation. Sun H; Qin J; Yu W; Zhao H; Wang H Chemosphere; 2024 Aug; 362():142582. PubMed ID: 38871192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between novel vibrating ceramic MBR and conventional air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment: Performance, fouling control and energy consumption. Wang C; Ng TCA; Ng HY Water Res; 2021 Sep; 203():117521. PubMed ID: 34391023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of structural vulnerability of flat-sheet membranes on fouling development in continuous submerged membrane bioreactors. Sano T; Koga Y; Ito H; Duc LV; Hama T; Kawagoshi Y Bioresour Technol; 2020 May; 304():123015. PubMed ID: 32088629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of fine bubble aeration intensity on membrane bioreactor sludge characteristics and fouling. De Temmerman L; Maere T; Temmink H; Zwijnenburg A; Nopens I Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():99-109. PubMed ID: 25794465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative power demand of mechanical and aeration imposed shear in an immersed membrane bioreactor. Buzatu P; Qiblawey H; Nasser MS; Judd S Water Res; 2017 Dec; 126():208-215. PubMed ID: 28957697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Membrane scouring to control fouling under fluidization of non-adsorbing media for wastewater treatment. Aslam M; Charfi A; Kim J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(2):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 28190230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge. Ratkovich N; Chan CC; Bentzen TR; Rasmussen MR Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):2061-70. PubMed ID: 22592479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clogging vs. fouling in immersed membrane bioreactors. Buzatu P; Qiblawey H; Odai A; Jamaleddin J; Nasser M; Judd SJ Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():46-54. PubMed ID: 30014978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pilot demonstration of energy-efficient membrane bioreactor (MBR) using reciprocating submerged membrane. Ho J; Smith S; Patamasank J; Tontcheva P; Kim GD; Roh HK Water Environ Res; 2015 Mar; 87(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 25842538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of fluid dynamics for MBR fouling mitigation. Böhm L; Drews A; Prieske H; Bérubé PR; Kraume M Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 122():50-61. PubMed ID: 22704186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]