129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38295494)
1. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
Wenman A; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An assessment of the dose and image quality difference between AP and PA positioned adult radiographic knee examinations.
Lockwood P; Mitchell M
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):123-134. PubMed ID: 36646545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimisation of the AP abdomen projection for larger patient body thicknesses.
Gatt S; Portelli JL; Zarb F
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Feb; 28(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 34544645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of kilovoltage, milliampere seconds, and focal spot size on image quality.
Kei Ma W; Hogg P; Norton S
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 24806050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL HAND EXAMINATION ON SIX OPTIMISED DR SYSTEMS.
Precht H; Outzen CB; Kusk MW; Bisgaard M; Waaler D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 194(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 33969425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical application of the optimized X-ray parameter model through analysis of disease risk and image quality when combining the ion chamber of automatic exposure control of digital radiography.
Hwang JH; Kim SB; Choi MK; Lee KB; Park CK
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1099-1114. PubMed ID: 36120755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifications to mobile chest radiography technique during the COVID-19 pandemic - implications of X-raying through side room windows.
England A; Littler E; Romani S; Cosson P
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):193-199. PubMed ID: 32855021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H; Persliden J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. General equations for optimal selection of diagnostic image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.
Zheng X
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):415-421. PubMed ID: 28822074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging.
Tugwell-Allsup J; Morris RW; Hibbs R; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e258-e263. PubMed ID: 32279922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
