BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38295554)

  • 1. Order effects in task-free learning: Tuning to information-carrying sound features.
    Todd J; Yeark M; Auriac P; Paton B; Winkler I
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():114-124. PubMed ID: 38295554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical timescales of statistical learning revealed by mismatch negativity to auditory pattern deviations.
    Fitzgerald K; Todd J
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():25-34. PubMed ID: 30268879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal digital filtering versus difference waves on the mismatch negativity in an uninterrupted sound paradigm.
    Kalyakin I; Gonzalez N; Joutsensalo J; Huttunen T; Kaartinen J; Lyytinen H
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(3):429-52. PubMed ID: 17559333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
    Fitzgerald K; Provost A; Todd J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28972671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive auditory change detection relies on unitary sensory memory representations.
    Czigler I; Winkler I
    Neuroreport; 1996 Nov; 7(15-17):2413-7. PubMed ID: 8981394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mismatch negativity area and age-related auditory memory.
    Pekkonen E; Jousmäki V; Partanen J; Karhu J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Nov; 87(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 7693443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.
    Todd J; Provost A; Cooper G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3399-405. PubMed ID: 21872613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mismatch negativity and the P3a components of the auditory event-related potentials in autistic low-functioning subjects.
    Ferri R; Elia M; Agarwal N; Lanuzza B; Musumeci SA; Pennisi G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1671-80. PubMed ID: 12948796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential.
    Winkler I; Schröger E; Cowan N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 13(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11224909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.
    Escera C; Alho K; Winkler I; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Sep; 10(5):590-604. PubMed ID: 9802992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit auditory perception of local and global irregularities in passive listening condition.
    Liaukovich K; Ukraintseva Y; Martynova O
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Jan; 165():108129. PubMed ID: 34929262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The spatio-temporal dynamics of deviance and target detection in the passive and active auditory oddball paradigm: a sLORETA study.
    Justen C; Herbert C
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29673322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory ERP components and mismatch negativity in dysphasic children.
    Korpilahti P; Lang HA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Oct; 91(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 7523075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mismatch negativity (MMN) for sequences of auditory and visual stimuli: evidence for a mechanism specific to the auditory modality.
    Nyman G; Alho K; Laurinen P; Paavilainen P; Radil T; Reinikainen K; Sams M; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 1701706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 15351440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mismatch Responses Evoked by Sound Pattern Violation in the Songbird Forebrain Suggest Common Auditory Processing With Human.
    Mori C; Okanoya K
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():822098. PubMed ID: 35309047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.