These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38295824)

  • 1. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Is independent double reading still required?
    Weigel S; Hense HW; Weyer-Elberich V; Gerss J; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2024 Aug; 196(8):834-842. PubMed ID: 38295824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.
    Sommer A; Weigel S; Hense HW; Gerß J; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Nekolla E; Lenzen H; Heindel W;
    Eur Radiol; 2025 Jan; 35(1):166-176. PubMed ID: 39012526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.
    Helvie MA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):917-29. PubMed ID: 20868894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating ten years of breast cancer screening with contrast enhanced mammography in women with Intermediate-high risk.
    Sorin V; Rahman N; Halabi N; Barash Y; Klang E; Sklair-Levy M
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Dec; 181():111807. PubMed ID: 39509749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort.
    Payne NR; Hickman SE; Black R; Priest AN; Hudson S; Gilbert FJ
    Eur Radiol; 2025 Jan; 35(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 39017933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Young KC
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Feb; 71(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 26707815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can digital breast tomosynthesis decrease interval cancers in a breast cancer screening program?
    Mullen LA
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):5425-5426. PubMed ID: 38319429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: Reducing Advanced Breast Cancers.
    Kim SY; Woo OH
    Radiology; 2024 Sep; 312(3):e242008. PubMed ID: 39287527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma.
    Onega T; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Henderson LM; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson ANA; Weaver D; Sprague BL; Bowles EJA; di Florio-Alexander RM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Dec; 202(3):505-514. PubMed ID: 37697031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AI-integrated Screening to Replace Double Reading of Mammograms: A Population-wide Accuracy and Feasibility Study.
    Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Graumann O; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Rasmussen BSB
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Nov; 6(6):e230529. PubMed ID: 39230423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Elías-Cabot E; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Brehl AK; Álvarez-Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3958-3966. PubMed ID: 37975920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2).
    Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():98-101. PubMed ID: 28107735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.