113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38296658)
1. Keeping your best options open with AI-based treatment planning in prostate and cervix brachytherapy.
Dickhoff LRM; Scholman RJ; Barten DLJ; Kerkhof EM; Roorda JJ; Velema LA; Stalpers LJA; Pieters BR; Bosman PAN; Alderliesten T
Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(2):188-198. PubMed ID: 38296658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards artificial intelligence-based automated treatment planning in clinical practice: A prospective study of the first clinical experiences in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Barten DLJ; Pieters BR; Bouter A; van der Meer MC; Maree SC; Hinnen KA; Westerveld H; Bosman PAN; Alderliesten T; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2023; 22(2):279-289. PubMed ID: 36635201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic bi-objective parameter tuning for inverse planning of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Maree SC; Bosman PAN; van Wieringen N; Niatsetski Y; Pieters BR; Bel A; Alderliesten T
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(7):075009. PubMed ID: 32028270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bi-objective treatment planning for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy-A retrospective observer study.
Maree SC; Luong NH; Kooreman ES; van Wieringen N; Bel A; Hinnen KA; Westerveld H; Pieters BR; Bosman PAN; Alderliesten T
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 30718176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GPU-accelerated bi-objective treatment planning for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Bouter A; Alderliesten T; Pieters BR; Bel A; Niatsetski Y; Bosman PAN
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3776-3787. PubMed ID: 31236948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the impact of real-time multicriteria optimizers integrated with interactive plan navigation tools for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Poulin É; Cui S; Vigneault É; Martin AG; Foster W; Després P; Cunha JAM; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):607-617. PubMed ID: 32713779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility-guided automated planning for stereotactic treatments of prostate cancer.
Romano C; Viola P; Craus M; Macchia G; Ferro M; Bonome P; Pierro A; Buwenge M; Arcelli A; Morganti AG; Deodato F; Cilla S
Med Dosim; 2023 Autumn; 48(3):140-148. PubMed ID: 36990847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PNaV: A tool for generating a high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan by navigating the Pareto surface guided by the visualization of multidimensional trade-offs.
Deufel CL; Epelman MA; Pasupathy KS; Sir MY; Wu VW; Herman MG
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(4):518-531. PubMed ID: 32423786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated Radiotherapy Planning for Patient-Specific Exploration of the Trade-Off Between Tumor Dose Coverage and Predicted Radiation-Induced Toxicity-A Proof of Principle Study for Prostate Cancer.
Bijman R; Rossi L; Sharfo AW; Heemsbergen W; Incrocci L; Breedveld S; Heijmen B
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():943. PubMed ID: 32695670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge-based inverse treatment planning for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Guthier CV; Orio PF; Buzurovic I; Cormack RA
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2108-2117. PubMed ID: 33586191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A GPU-based multi-criteria optimization algorithm for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Cui S; Ma Y; Després P; Adam M Cunha J; Beaulieu L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105005. PubMed ID: 30970341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the determination of an effective planning volume for permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11240263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single line source with and without vaginal loading and the impact on target coverage and organ at risk doses for cervix cancer Stages IB, II, and IIIB: treatment planning simulation in patients treated with MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in a multicentre study (EMBRACE).
Nkiwane KS; Pötter R; Tanderup K; Federico M; Lindegaard JC; Kirisits C
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 23474352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying the column generation method to the intensity modulated high dose rate brachytherapy inverse planning problem.
Antaki M; Renaud MA; Morcos M; Seuntjens J; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(6):. PubMed ID: 36791469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative optimization of needle placement and dwell times for conformal prostate brachytherapy.
Edmundson GK; Yan D; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1257-63. PubMed ID: 7493850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
