118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38296658)
21. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging.
Zaider M; Zelefsky MJ; Lee EK; Zakian KL; Amols HI; Dyke J; Cohen G; Hu Y; Endi AK; Chui C; Koutcher JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(4):1085-96. PubMed ID: 10863082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intraoperative dynamic dose optimization in permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jul; 56(3):854-61. PubMed ID: 12788195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric equivalence of nonstandard HDR brachytherapy catheter patterns.
Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):233-9. PubMed ID: 19235391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intraoperative optimization of needle placement and dwell times for conformal prostate brachytherapy.
Edmundson GK; Yan D; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1257-63. PubMed ID: 7493850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel tools for stepping source brachytherapy treatment planning: enhanced geometrical optimization and interactive inverse planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Koedooder K; Petra Kok H; van Wieringen N; Pieters BR; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):348-53. PubMed ID: 25563274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inverse planning optimization for hybrid prostate permanent-seed implant brachytherapy plans using two source strengths.
Cunha JA; Pickett B; Pouliot J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 11(3):3096. PubMed ID: 20717078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy dose distributions with iridium-192, ytterbium-169, and thulium-170 sources.
Krishnamurthy D; Weinberg V; Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 21397569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of automated post-adjustments of HDR prostate brachytherapy treatment plans by quantitative measures and oncologist observer study.
Dohlmar F; Morén B; Sandborg M; Smedby Ö; Valdman A; Larsson T; Carlsson Tedgren Å
Brachytherapy; 2023; 22(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 36739222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A stochastic frontier analysis for enhanced treatment quality of high-dose-rate brachytherapy plans.
Edimo P; Kroshko A; Beaulieu L; Archambault L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065012. PubMed ID: 30731437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of HDR brachytherapy-replicating prostate radiotherapy planning for tomotherapy, cyberknife and VMAT.
de Chavez R; Grogan G; Hug B; Howe K; Grigg A; Waterhouse D; Lane J; Glyde A; Brown E; Bydder S; Pryor D; Hargrave C; Charles PH; Hellyer J; Ebert MA
Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 34551879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A multi-criteria optimization approach for HDR prostate brachytherapy: II. Benchmark against clinical plans.
Cui S; Després P; Beaulieu L
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205005. PubMed ID: 30226469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. On the determination of an effective planning volume for permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11240263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robust optimization for HDR prostate brachytherapy applied to organ reconstruction uncertainty.
van der Meer MC; Bosman PAN; Niatsetski Y; Alderliesten T; Pieters BR; Bel A
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(5):055001. PubMed ID: 33503602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Single line source with and without vaginal loading and the impact on target coverage and organ at risk doses for cervix cancer Stages IB, II, and IIIB: treatment planning simulation in patients treated with MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in a multicentre study (EMBRACE).
Nkiwane KS; Pötter R; Tanderup K; Federico M; Lindegaard JC; Kirisits C
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 23474352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inter-observer evaluation of a GPU-based multicriteria optimization algorithm combined with plan navigation tools for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Poulin É; Aubin S; Vigneault É; Martin AG; Foster W; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2022; 21(4):551-560. PubMed ID: 35585019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simultaneous needle catheter selection and dwell time optimization for preplanning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Wang C; Gonzalez Y; Shen C; Hrycushko B; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(5):055028. PubMed ID: 33264753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
