These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38298365)

  • 1. Lying about money and game points by men and women and its relation to the Self-Reported Lying Scale.
    Elaad E; Kochav R; Elkouby T
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1304237. PubMed ID: 38298365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influences of a Luck Game on Offers in Ultimatum and Dictator Games: Is There a Mediation of Emotions?
    Matarazzo O; Pizzini B; Greco C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():13. PubMed ID: 32116888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in economic decision-making: Exogenous estradiol has opposing effects on fairness framing in women and men.
    Coenjaerts M; Pape F; Santoso V; Grau F; Stoffel-Wagner B; Philipsen A; Schultz J; Hurlemann R; Scheele D
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2021 Sep; 50():46-54. PubMed ID: 33957337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Counterfactual Comparison on Fairness in Gain-Loss Contexts.
    Li Q; Wang C; Taxer J; Yang Z; Zheng Y; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():683. PubMed ID: 28536542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face-to-Face Lying: Gender and Motivation to Deceive.
    Elaad E; Gonen-Gal Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():820923. PubMed ID: 35391990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relations between deception, narcissism and self-assessed lie- and truth-related abilities.
    Elaad E; Hanania SB; Mazor S; Zvi L
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(5):880-893. PubMed ID: 33833615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lying to Police Officers in the Ultimatum Game: An Experimental Study With Israeli Samples.
    Elaad E
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Jun; ():332941231180443. PubMed ID: 37282578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
    Nowak MA; Page KM; Sigmund K
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5485):1773-5. PubMed ID: 10976075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Money talks: neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives.
    Zhou Y; Wang Y; Rao LL; Yang LQ; Li S
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():150. PubMed ID: 24834034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social information and economic decision-making in the ultimatum game.
    Gaertig C; Moser A; Alguacil S; Ruz M
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():103. PubMed ID: 22783164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinship, Family, and Gender Effects in the Ultimatum Game.
    Macfarlan SJ; Quinlan RJ
    Hum Nat; 2008 Sep; 19(3):294-309. PubMed ID: 26181619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Novakova J; Flegr J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological Markers of Fairness and Selfishness Revealed by a Combination of Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Miraghaie AM; Pouretemad H; Villa AEP; Mazaheri MA; Khosrowabadi R; Lintas A
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2022; 16():765720. PubMed ID: 35615426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.