These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38298365)

  • 21. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Novakova J; Flegr J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. It is only fair: blood donors are more sensitive to violations of fairness norms than nondonors - converging psychometric and ultimatum game evidence.
    Ferguson E; Lawrence C
    Vox Sang; 2018 Apr; 113(3):242-250. PubMed ID: 29424063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evolutionary dynamics of fairness on graphs with migration.
    Wang X; Chen X; Wang L
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Sep; 380():103-14. PubMed ID: 26004749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
    Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of male's facial attractiveness, vocal attractiveness and social interest on female's decisions of fairness.
    Shang J; Zhang Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16778. PubMed ID: 39039258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wei C; Zheng L; Che L; Cheng X; Li L; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():182. PubMed ID: 29515497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Children strategically conceal selfishness.
    Gonzalez G; Ahl RE; Cordes S; McAuliffe K
    Child Dev; 2022 Jan; 93(1):e71-e86. PubMed ID: 34705266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
    Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective Fair Behavior as a Function of Psychopathic Traits in a Subclinical Population.
    Osumi T; Ohira H
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1604. PubMed ID: 28955290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On Playing with Emotion: A Spatial Evolutionary Variation of the Ultimatum Game.
    Charcon DY; Monteiro LHA
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Feb; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 38539716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Emergent dynamics of fairness in the spatial coevolution of proposer and responder species in the ultimatum game.
    Suzuki R; Okamoto T; Arita T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116901. PubMed ID: 25625524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in fairness and trust between lean and corpulent men.
    Kubera B; Klement J; Wagner C; Rädel C; Eggeling J; Füllbrunn S; Kaczmarek MC; Levinsky R; Peters A
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2016 Nov; 40(11):1802-1808. PubMed ID: 27485913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.
    Sánchez-Amaro A; Rossano F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 288(1962):20211937. PubMed ID: 34727713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simulating Personal Wealth in the Laboratory.
    Brandt AE; Martin J
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):167-81. PubMed ID: 26273939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.