128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38299809)
1. The new robotic system HUGO RAS for gynecologic surgery: First European experience from Gemelli Hospital.
Gioè A; Monterossi G; Gueli Alletti S; Panico G; Campagna G; Costantini B; Naldini A; Pedone Anchora L; Oliva R; Mastrovito S; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Scambia G
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 38299809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy.
Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A
Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center.
Mottaran A; Bravi CA; Sarchi L; Paciotti M; Nocera L; Piro A; Piazza P; De Backer P; Farinha R; De Groote R; De Naeyer G; Mottrie A
J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 36053673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.
Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of percutaneous-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: A multicentric Italian experience.
Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Cretì A; Cianci S; Uccella S; Fedele C; Fanfani F; Palmieri S; Fagotti A; Scambia G; Rossitto C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Feb; 245():181-185. PubMed ID: 31923738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.
Varghese A; Doglioli M; Fader AN
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 62(4):733-748. PubMed ID: 31524659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic docking time with the Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM).
Panico G; Mastrovito S; Campagna G; Monterossi G; Costantini B; Gioè A; Oliva R; Ferraro C; Ercoli A; Fanfani F; Scambia G
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2547-2554. PubMed ID: 37542580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the novel Hugo™ RAS system: Feasibility, setting and perioperative outcomes of the first off-clamp series.
Prata F; Ragusa A; Civitella A; Tuzzolo P; Tedesco F; Cacciatore L; Iannuzzi A; Callè P; Raso G; Fantozzi M; Pira M; Ricci M; Pino M; Minore A; Basile S; Testa A; Crimi VG; Deanesi N; Travino A; D'Addurno G; Scarpa RM; Papalia R
Urologia; 2024 May; 91(2):372-378. PubMed ID: 38174713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: Feasibility in obese patients].
Planque H; Martin-Françoise S; Lequesne J; Le Brun JF
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Sep; 46(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 30115552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots.
Bravi CA; Balestrazzi E; De Loof M; Rebuffo S; Piramide F; Mottaran A; Paciotti M; Sorce G; Nocera L; Sarchi L; Peraire M; Colla'-Ruvolo C; Frego N; Piro A; Ticonosco M; De Backer P; Farinha R; Van Den Bossche H; De Naeyer G; D'Hondt F; De Groote R; Mottrie A
Eur Urol Focus; 2024 Jan; 10(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 37634969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single site robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension (SS R-ALS) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: first case reported.
Giannini A; Russo E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):259-262. PubMed ID: 27987068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HUGO(TM) RAS System in urogynaecology: the first nerve sparing Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Panico G; Campagna G; Caramazza D; Vacca L; Mastrovito S; Ercoli A; Scambia G
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2023 Mar; 15(1):83-87. PubMed ID: 37010339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First case of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction with the Hugo RAS system: step-by-step surgical setup and technique.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sarchi L; Assumma S; Turri F; Sangalli M; Gaia G; Grasso A; Dell'Orto P; Calcagnile T; Piacentini I; Coelho RF; Terzoni S; Panio E; Moscovas MC; Patel V
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2247-2251. PubMed ID: 37294418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
