These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3830043)

  • 1. Effects of the EMG amplifier filter settings on the motor unit action potential parameters recorded with concentric and monopolar needles.
    Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 26(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 3830043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles.
    Chan RC; Hsu TC
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concentric macro electromyography.
    Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Sep; 14(9):820-5. PubMed ID: 1922175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in motor unit action potential parameters in monopolar recordings related to filter settings of the EMG amplifier.
    Chu J; Chen RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 66(9):601-4. PubMed ID: 4038025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part I. Normal subjects.
    Bauermeister W; Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1406764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single fiber macro versus concentric trigger macro EMG: a comparison of methods.
    Nix WA; Scherer A
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Feb; 15(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 1549140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis.
    Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part II. Patients with diseases of muscle and nerve.
    Gan R; Jabre JF
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1085-8. PubMed ID: 1406765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of the method of recording motor unit action potentials in man with a needle electrode.
    Khamitov KhS; Bogdanov EI; Khabirov FA
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 4077066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recording and physical characteristics of disposable concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Tedman B; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Oct; 13(10):909-14. PubMed ID: 2233847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Progressive teflon denudation of the monopolar needle: effects on motor unit potential parameters.
    Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 68(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 3800622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of standard and pediatric size concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 118(5):1162-5. PubMed ID: 17382584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of sensitivities of macro EMG and concentric needle EMG in L4 radiculopathy.
    Ulas UH; Cengiz B; Alanoglu E; Ozdag MF; Odabasi Z; Vural O
    Neurol Sci; 2003 Nov; 24(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 14658043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Needle electromyography: Basic concepts.
    Rubin DI
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():243-256. PubMed ID: 31277852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of motor unit action potentials using monopolar vs. concentric needle electrodes in the middle deltoid and abductor digiti minimi muscles.
    Nelson RM; Shedlock M; Kaczmarek C; Gahrs J; MacLaughlin H
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Dec; 43(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 14717026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multifrequency characteristics of disposable and nondisposable EMG needle electrodes.
    Ackmann JJ; Lomas JN; Hoffmann RG; Wertsch JJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Jun; 16(6):616-23. PubMed ID: 8502259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New EMG methods to study the motor unit.
    Stålberg E
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 39():38-49. PubMed ID: 3308420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor unit analysis. Comparison between concentric and monopolar electrodes.
    Pease WS; Bowyer BL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 67(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3345237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.