BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38302129)

  • 1. Atypia detected during breast screening and subsequent development of cancer: observational analysis of the Sloane atypia prospective cohort in England.
    Freeman K; Jenkinson D; Clements K; Wallis MG; Pinder SE; Provenzano E; Stobart H; Stallard N; Kearins O; Sharma N; Shaaban A; Kirwan CC; Hilton B; Thompson AM; Taylor-Phillips S;
    BMJ; 2024 Feb; 384():e077039. PubMed ID: 38302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast screening atypia and subsequent development of cancer: protocol for an observational analysis of the Sloane database in England (Sloane atypia cohort study).
    Jenkinson D; Freeman K; Clements K; Hilton B; Dulson-Cox J; Kearins O; Stallard N; Wallis MG; Sharma N; Kirwan C; Pinder S; Provenzano E; Shaaban AM; Stobart H; McDonnell S; Thompson AM; Taylor-Phillips S
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e058050. PubMed ID: 34996804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cohort profile of the Sloane Project: methodology for a prospective UK cohort study of >15 000 women with screen-detected non-invasive breast neoplasia.
    Clements K; Dodwell D; Hilton B; Stevens-Harris I; Pinder S; Wallis MG; Maxwell AJ; Kearins O; Sibbering M; Shaaban AM; Kirwan C; Sharma N; Stobart H; Dulson-Cox J; Litherland J; Mylvaganam S; Provenzano E; Sawyer E; Thompson AM
    BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e061585. PubMed ID: 36535720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
    Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.
    Duffy SW; Mackay J; Thomas S; Anderson E; Chen TH; Ellis I; Evans G; Fielder H; Fox R; Gui G; Macmillan D; Moss S; Rogers C; Sibbering M; Wallis M; Warren R; Watson E; Whynes D; Allgood P; Caunt J
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. PubMed ID: 23489892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.
    Miller AB; Wall C; Baines CJ; Sun P; To T; Narod SA
    BMJ; 2014 Feb; 348():g366. PubMed ID: 24519768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
    Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cumulative 6-Year Risk of Screen-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Screening Frequency.
    Sprague BL; Chen S; Miglioretti DL; Gard CC; Tice JA; Hubbard RA; Aiello Bowles EJ; Kaufman PA; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Feb; 6(2):e230166. PubMed ID: 36808238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
    Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer death after non-screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ from 1990 to 2018 in England: population based cohort study.
    Mannu GS; Wang Z; Dodwell D; Broggio J; Charman J; Darby SC
    BMJ; 2024 Jan; 384():e075498. PubMed ID: 38267073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography in Older Women.
    Upneja A; Long JB; Aminawung JA; Kyanko KA; Kunst N; Xu X; Busch SH; Gross CP; Richman IB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Jun; 37(8):1870-1876. PubMed ID: 34595682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
    Ho TH; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Lee CI; Tice JA; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e222440. PubMed ID: 35333365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.