These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3830256)

  • 1. Progeny testing with auxiliary traits.
    Narain P
    Biometrics; 1985 Dec; 41(4):895-907. PubMed ID: 3830256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
    Enns RM; Nicoll GB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic parameters for measures of energetic efficiency of bulls and their relationships with carcass traits of field progeny in Japanese Black cattle.
    Hoque MA; Hosono M; Oikawa T; Suzuki K
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 18765855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining genetic test information and correlated phenotypic records for breeding value estimation.
    Spangler ML; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 17085722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with auxiliary traits.
    Narain P
    J Biosci; 2003 Sep; 28(5):569-79. PubMed ID: 14517360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic parameters for oocyte number and embryo production within a bovine ovum pick-up-in vitro production embryo-production program.
    Merton JS; Ask B; Onkundi DC; Mullaart E; Colenbrander B; Nielen M
    Theriogenology; 2009 Oct; 72(7):885-93. PubMed ID: 19716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic analysis of breeding traits in a Charolais cattle population segregating an inactive myostatin allele.
    Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1865-71. PubMed ID: 19213706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle.
    Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 16882088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phenotypic plasticity and experimental evolution.
    Garland T; Kelly SA
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Jun; 209(Pt 12):2344-61. PubMed ID: 16731811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Across-breed adjustment factors for expected progeny differences for carcass traits.
    Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 17339411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Possible uses of genetic markers for improving fertility and health in swine production].
    Steinheuer R; Drögemüller C; Hamann H; Distl O
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Jun; 110(6):255-65. PubMed ID: 12866259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate analyses of carcass traits for Angus cattle fitting reduced rank and factor analytic models.
    Meyer K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):50-64. PubMed ID: 17488355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.