181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38302922)
21. Real-world Direct Health Care Costs for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab-containing Regimens in First-line or First-line Through Second-line Therapy.
Johnston S; Wilson K; Varker H; Malangone-Monaco E; Juneau P; Riehle E; Satram-Hoang S; Sommer N; Ogale S
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Dec; 16(4):386-396.e1. PubMed ID: 28619608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A study-level meta-analysis of efficacy data from head-to-head first-line trials of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors versus bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.
Heinemann V; Rivera F; O'Neil BH; Stintzing S; Koukakis R; Terwey JH; Douillard JY
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 67():11-20. PubMed ID: 27592068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Ferrara R; Imbimbo M; Malouf R; Paget-Bailly S; Calais F; Marchal C; Westeel V
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 12(12):CD013257. PubMed ID: 33316104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
Price T; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Guan X; Peeters M
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():51-59. PubMed ID: 27716478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of Primary Tumor Location on First-line Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Snyder M; Bottiglieri S; Almhanna K
Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2018; 13(2):139-149. PubMed ID: 29595113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cetuximab versus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a comparative effectiveness study.
Marques RP; Godinho AR; Heudtlass P; Pais HL; Quintela A; Martins AP
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 146(5):1321-1334. PubMed ID: 32144533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Triplet-drug chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibody as an effective therapy for patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Tian M; Li H; Dong W; Li Y; Jiang T; Lv Y; Zeng J; Jiang X; Yin Z; Xiao J
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 37978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Histological response, pattern of tumor destruction and clinical outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab or cetuximab in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
Stremitzer S; Stift J; Singh J; Starlinger P; Gruenberger B; Tamandl D; Gruenberger T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):868-74. PubMed ID: 25865557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sequential cetuximab/bevacizumab therapy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hsu HC; Liu YC; Wang CW; Chou WC; Hsu YJ; Chiang JM; Lin YC; Yang TS
Cancer Med; 2019 Jul; 8(7):3437-3446. PubMed ID: 31090176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of second-line cetuximab-containing therapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the ITACa randomized clinical trial.
Passardi A; Scarpi E; Gelsomino F; Palladino MA; Casadei Gardini A; Turci D; Chiuri VE; Mucciarini C; Tassinari D; Ragazzini A; Frassineti GL; Valgiusti M; Ulivi P; Amadori D
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):10426. PubMed ID: 28874797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relation of cetuximab-induced skin toxicity and early tumor shrinkage in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the randomized phase 3 trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK0306).
Holch JW; Held S; Stintzing S; Fischer von Weikersthal L; Decker T; Kiani A; Kaiser F; Heintges T; Kahl C; Kullmann F; Scheithauer W; Moehler M; von Einem JC; Michl M; Heinemann V
Ann Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 31912799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The efficacy and toxicity of maintenance therapy with bevacizumab plus pemetrexed versus bevacizumab/pemetrexed alone for stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu M; Luo N; Fang Z; Liu Q; Yi F; Wei Y; Zhang X; Zhang W
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2022 Feb; 47(2):157-167. PubMed ID: 34617297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of bevacizumab and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer across selected public hospitals in Queensland.
Chapman SJ; McKavanagh D; Burge ME; McPherson I; Walpole E; Hollingworth SA
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):e253-e261. PubMed ID: 27435535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chan DLH; Segelov E; Wong RS; Smith A; Herbertson RA; Li BT; Tebbutt N; Price T; Pavlakis N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD007047. PubMed ID: 28654140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang H; You J; Liu W; Chen D; Zhang S; Wang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(30):e26714. PubMed ID: 34397704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to cetuximab- or panitumumab-based therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a meta-analysis from randomized control trials.
Lv Y; Yang Z; Zhao L; Zhao S; Han J; Zheng L
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(1):334-45. PubMed ID: 25785004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The efficacy of panitumumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Duan KF; Wang H
J BUON; 2019; 24(4):1457-1463. PubMed ID: 31646791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chemotherapy With or Without Anti-EGFR Agents in Left- and Right-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Wang ZX; Wu HX; He MM; Wang YN; Luo HY; Ding PR; Xie D; Chen G; Li YH; Wang F; Xu RH
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jul; 17(7):805-811. PubMed ID: 31319395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
