133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38303004)
1. Improving lesion detection in mammograms by leveraging a Cycle-GAN-based lesion remover.
Lee J; Nishikawa RM
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):21. PubMed ID: 38303004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.
Hossain MB; Nishikawa RM; Lee J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608. PubMed ID: 35916103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of GAN artifacts for simulating mammograms on identifying mammographically occult cancer.
Lee J; Mustafaev T; Nishikawa RM
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Sep; 10(5):054503. PubMed ID: 37840849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying Women With Mammographically- Occult Breast Cancer Leveraging GAN-Simulated Mammograms.
Lee J; Nishikawa RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2022 Jan; 41(1):225-236. PubMed ID: 34460371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RAMS: Remote and automatic mammogram screening.
Cogan T; Cogan M; Tamil L
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Apr; 107():18-29. PubMed ID: 30771549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer detection using synthetic mammograms from generative adversarial networks in convolutional neural networks.
Guan S; Loew M
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):031411. PubMed ID: 30915386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms.
Boumaraf S; Liu X; Ferkous C; Ma X
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7695207. PubMed ID: 32462017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer.
Becker AS; Marcon M; Ghafoor S; Wurnig MC; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jul; 52(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 28212138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection.
Webb LJ; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA; Ghate SV; Kim C; Soo MS; Walsh R
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1972-80. PubMed ID: 21626930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of General Adversarial Networks in Mammogram Analysis: A Review.
Gopal A; Gandhimaruthian L; Ali J
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(7):863-877. PubMed ID: 33059556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. YOLO Based Breast Masses Detection and Classification in Full-Field Digital Mammograms.
Aly GH; Marey M; El-Sayed SA; Tolba MF
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105823. PubMed ID: 33190942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A deep learning framework to classify breast density with noisy labels regularization.
Lopez-Almazan H; Javier Pérez-Benito F; Larroza A; Perez-Cortes JC; Pollan M; Perez-Gomez B; Salas Trejo D; Casals M; Llobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106885. PubMed ID: 35594581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
