103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 383036)
1. [The importance of mammography for the determination of tumor size in stage classification of breast cancer according to the TNM system (5-years-results) (author's transl)].
Hüttner J; Berndt H; Eichhorn HJ
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1979; 49(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 383036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved determination of breast cancer size in mammography.
Sphiris N; Panayiotakis G; Proimos B; Likaki H; Tzoracoleftherakis E
Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8885094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation study of the UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors, seventh edition, in breast cancer.
Uehiro N; Horii R; Iwase T; Tanabe M; Sakai T; Morizono H; Kimura K; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Makita M; Ito Y; Akiyama F
Breast Cancer; 2014 Nov; 21(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 23435963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
Duraker N; Caynak ZC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the TNM staging system for breast cancer still relevant in the era of biomarkers and emerging personalized medicine for breast cancer - an institution's 10-year experience.
Orucevic A; Chen J; McLoughlin JM; Heidel RE; Panella T; Bell J
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25600504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technologic considerations for breast tumor size assessment.
Davis PL; McCarty KS
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 7489313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Breast cancer with noninflammatory skin involvement: new data revise the traditional image of a "classical" clinicopathologic entity].
Güth U; Wight E; Singer G
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2006 Nov; 95(47):1829-35. PubMed ID: 17168078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the 7th TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis on prognostic implications for operated node-negative cases.
Bergman P; Brodin D; Lewensohn R; de Petris L
Acta Oncol; 2013 Aug; 52(6):1189-94. PubMed ID: 23215828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Contribution of mammography to clinical staging of breast cancer according to TNM system].
Hüttner J; Berndt H; Eichhorn HJ
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1969; 34(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 5397535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The 1978 TNM system for cancer of the breast: proposal for a modification].
García Vilanova A; Company Serrano RA; Fuster Diana E; Checa Ayet F; Trullenque Peris R; García-Vilanova Comas A
Rev Esp Oncol; 1985; 32(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 3843007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognosis of stage II and III breast cancer in women and critique of various aspects of the TNM system].
García Vilanova A; Sancho Merle MF; Vázquez Albaladejo C; Fuster Diana E; Cano Peral J
Rev Esp Oncol; 1980; 27(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 7255847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. T4 breast cancer under closer inspection: a case for revision of the TNM classification.
Güth U; Jane Huang D; Holzgreve W; Wight E; Singer G
Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):625-36. PubMed ID: 17604172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
Elmore JM; Kadesky KT; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 14635066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognosis of women with pT4b breast cancer: the significance of this category in the TNM system.
Harms K; Wittekind C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 18215492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Criteria for the definition of early cancer of the breast (author's transl)].
Zippel HH; Hardt M; Citoler P
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1981 May; 106(19):605-9. PubMed ID: 7215188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. T4 category revision enhances the accuracy and significance of stage III breast cancer.
Güth U; Singer G; Langer I; Schötzau A; Herberich L; Holzgreve W; Wight E
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2569-75. PubMed ID: 16688772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical significance of perineural invasion in stages II and III colorectal cancer.
Zhou Y; Wang H; Gong H; Cao M; Zhang G; Wang Y
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Nov; 211(11):839-44. PubMed ID: 26429129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The value of mammography in 1203 breast cancers (author's transl)].
Guzzon A; Viganotti G; Bergonzi S; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Nessi R
Radiol Med; 1981 Jun; 67(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 7268104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A tumour gauge to measure breast lumps for use with mammograms.
Gordon AB
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1985 Jun; 11(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 4007177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
