These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38305664)

  • 1. An in vitro study using confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the marginal misfits of different implant-supported frameworks.
    Tonin BSH; Fu J; Peixoto RF; Fischer NG; Fernandes RM; Curylofo PA; de Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP; de Almeida RP
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38305664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical microgap and passivity of fit of three-unit implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different techniques.
    Berejuk HM; Shimizu RH; de Mattias Sartori IA; Valgas L; Tiossi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1064-70. PubMed ID: 25216131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
    Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of misfit and stress distribution in implant-retained prosthesis obtained by different methods.
    Tonin BSH; Peixoto RF; Fu J; Freitas BN; Mattos MDGC; Macedo AP
    Braz Dent J; 2021; 32(5):67-76. PubMed ID: 34877979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision Fit of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated by CAD/CAM, Copy-Milling, and Conventional Methods.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Carreiro AF; Barbosa GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):507–513. PubMed ID: 27706265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative section method for casting and posterior laser welding of metallic frameworks for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    de Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mde G; Ribeiro RF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19141050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial denture: An in vitro comparative study on vertical misfit, stress distribution, and cantilever fracture strength.
    Peixoto RF; Tonin BSH; Pinto-Fiamengui LMS; Freitas-Pontes KM; Regis RR; Mattos MDGC
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37470305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An
    Singh M; Yadav BK; Phukela SS; Ritwal P; Nagpal A; Saluja P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 36511053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessment of the active and passive fit.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Simonaitis T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):589-596. PubMed ID: 35527068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthetic misfit of implant-supported prosthesis obtained by an alternative section method.
    Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho HB; de Aguiar FA; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 May; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 22737313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passivity of conventional and CAD/CAM fabricated implant frameworks.
    de Araújo GM; de França DG; Silva Neto JP; Barbosa GA
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 26200153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study.
    Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Rotkina L; Zbären C; Enkling N; Blatz MB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23025489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
    Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 2: Screw resistance test.
    Rutkunas V; Dirse J; Kules D; Mischitz I; Larsson C; Janda M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 35981927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misfit of Implant-Supported Zirconia (Y-TZP) CAD-CAM Framework Compared to Non-Zirconia Frameworks: A Systematic Review.
    Alsayed HD
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Device trueness in passivity and misfit of CAD-CAM frameworks: Conventional versus printed casts.
    Pereira ALC; de Luna Gomes JM; Campos MFTP; de Medeiros AKB; Torres ACSP; Pellizzer EP; Carreiro ADFP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37748995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.