154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38305717)
21. MRI as a complementary tool for the assessment of suspicious mammographic calcifications: Does it have a role?
Di Ninno AAM; Mello GGN; Torres US; Shimizu C; Tucunduva TCM; Reis FRS; Ananias MPF; Lederman HM
Clin Imaging; 2021 Jun; 74():76-83. PubMed ID: 33454580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Apocrine Metaplasia Found at MR Biopsy: Is There Something to be Learned?
Gao Y; Dialani V; DeBenedectis C; Johnson N; Brachtel E; Slanetz P
Breast J; 2017 Jul; 23(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 28079289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of Mammographic Microcalcifications with Final Surgical Pathology After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Azam R; Lim D; Curpen B; Mulligan AM; Hong NL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4123-4131. PubMed ID: 37029866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of Features in Probably Benign and Malignant Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI.
Ahmadinejad N; Azizinik F; Khosravi P; Torabi A; Mohajeri A; Arian A
Int J Breast Cancer; 2024; 2024():6661849. PubMed ID: 38523651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do Calcifications Seen on Mammography After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Always Need to Be Excised?
Feliciano Y; Mamtani A; Morrow M; Stempel MM; Patil S; Jochelson MS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1492-1498. PubMed ID: 28058550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas.
Chikarmane SA; Michaels AY; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 28834447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recalibrating the decision for MRI-directed breast ultrasound in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, factors predicting sonographic success.
Maimone S; Morozov AP; Li Z; Craver EC; Elder EA; McLaughlin SA
Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():391-399. PubMed ID: 34530358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Kang JH; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Eun NL; Ko KH; Son EJ
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 30174479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How Well Does Non-mass Enhancement Correlate With DCIS/Invasive Cancer?
Huang K; Dufresne M; Baksh M; Nussbaum S; Abbaszadeh Kasbi A; Mohammed A; Advani P; Morozov A; Bagaria S; McLaughlin S; Gabriel E
Am Surg; 2023 Dec; 89(12):5414-5420. PubMed ID: 36788122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The clinical significance of accompanying NME on preoperative MR imaging in breast cancer patients.
Gweon HM; Jeong J; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim JA; Ko KH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178445. PubMed ID: 28558007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Significance of Non-Mass Enhancement in the Subareolar Region on Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Jun S; Bae SJ; Cha YJ; Cha C; Park S; Kim D; Lee J; Ahn SG; Son EJ; Jeong J
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):e458-e468. PubMed ID: 32201166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. MRI prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response is equivalent in patients with or without mammographic calcifications: a step towards adapting surgical approach?
Sella T; Simor B; Adler-Levy Y; Maly B; Kadouri L; Carmon E
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7168-7177. PubMed ID: 37086288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can enhancement types on preoperative MRI reflect prognostic factors and surgical outcomes in invasive breast cancer?
Koh J; Park AY; Ko KH; Jung HK
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):7000-7008. PubMed ID: 31187220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patterns of malignant non-mass enhancement on 3-T breast MRI help predict invasiveness: using the BI-RADS lexicon fifth edition.
Lee SM; Nam KJ; Choo KS; Kim JY; Jeong DW; Kim HY; Kim JY
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 29758996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic resonance imaging features for differentiating breast papilloma with high-risk or malignant lesions from benign papilloma: a retrospective study on 158 patients.
Wang LJ; Wu P; Li XX; Luo R; Wang DB; Guan WB
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):234. PubMed ID: 30558621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association between Oncotype DX Test Recurrence Score and BI-RADS Mammographic and Breast MR Imaging Features.
Woodard GA; Ray KM; Joe BN; Price ER
Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 28885890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ploumen RAW; de Mooij CM; Gommers S; Keymeulen KBMI; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5423-5435. PubMed ID: 37020070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Kinetic Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Determined Using Computer-aided Diagnosis of Preoperative MRI Scans: Relationship to Distant Metastasis-Free Survival.
Kim JY; Kim JJ; Hwangbo L; Suh HB; Kim S; Choo KS; Nam KJ; Kang T
Radiology; 2020 Jun; 295(3):517-526. PubMed ID: 32228293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
