These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38306224)

  • 1. Identifying Suspected Volume Conduction Contamination of External Anal Sphincter Motor Evoked Potentials in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery.
    Wilkinson M; Ajoku U; Pederson K; McIntrye I; Zarrabian M
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2024 Feb; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 38306224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the external anal sphincter muscle to transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Takashi S; Kakimoto M; Sakamoto T; Kitaguchi K; Furuya H; Morimoto T; Sakaki T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):E454-9. PubMed ID: 12438996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral External Anal Sphincter MEP Monitoring in a Case of Conus Medullaris Tumor.
    Manohar N; Palan A; Manjunath ST; Manchala RK
    Neurol India; 2021; 69(5):1354-1355. PubMed ID: 34747811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activation of the external anal and urethral sphincter muscles by repetitive transcranial cortical stimulation during spine surgery.
    Haghighi SS; Zhang R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2004 Feb; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15139577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of motor evoked potentials to diagnose and reduce lower extremity motor nerve root injuries during 4,386 extradural posterior lumbosacral spine procedures.
    Wilent WB; Tesdahl EA; Harrop JS; Welch WC; Cannestra AF; Poelstra KA; Epplin-Zapf T; Stivali T; Cohen J; Sestokas AK
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 31479780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor evoked potentials recorded from external anal sphincter by cortical and lumbo-sacral magnetic stimulation: normative data.
    Pelliccioni G; Scarpino O; Piloni V
    J Neurol Sci; 1997 Jul; 149(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 9168168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of a Combination of Waveform Amplitude Latency and Decrease of Waveform Amplitude Magnitude during Spinal Surgery in Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials and Its Incidence on Postoperative Neurological Deficit].
    Beňuška J; Čembová N; Naser Y; Žabka M; Pasiar J; Švec A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 32131970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-stimulus theta power is correlated with variation of motor evoked potential latency: a single-pulse TMS study.
    İşcan Z; Schurger A; Vernet M; Sitt JD; Valero-Cabré A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):3003-3014. PubMed ID: 30116864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of inhalational anesthetic agents on the baseline monitorability of motor evoked potentials during spine surgery: a review of 22,755 cervical and lumbar procedures.
    Wilent WB; Tesdahl EA; Trott JT; Tassone S; Harrop JS; Klineberg EO; Sestokas AK
    Spine J; 2021 Nov; 21(11):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 34274500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrarectal ground electrode improves the reliability of motor evoked potentials recorded in the anal sphincter.
    Lefaucheur JP
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Jul; 32(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 15880519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pudendal nerve "complete" motor latencies at four different levels in the anal sphincter system in young adults.
    Sato T; Nagai H
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 Jul; 45(7):923-7. PubMed ID: 12130881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in motor evoked potential latencies in the anal sphincter system with sacral magnetic stimulation.
    Sato T; Konishi F; Kanazawa K
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2000 Jul; 43(7):966-70. PubMed ID: 10910244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EMG characteristics of the external anal sphincter guarding reflex and effects of a unilateral ventral root avulsion injury in rhesus macaques ( Macaca mulatta).
    Chang HH; Lee U; Vu T; Pikov V; Nieto JH; Christe KL; Havton LA
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2710-2718. PubMed ID: 30089020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of external anal sphincter EMG recording for intraoperative neuromonitoring of the sacral roots-a prospective study in dorsal rhizotomy.
    Sindou M; Joud A; Georgoulis G
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2021 Feb; 163(2):479-487. PubMed ID: 33064201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective Waveform Analysis of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) to Identify Early Predictors of Impending Motor Deficits in Spinal Surgeries.
    Le S; Nguyen V; Ekwueme AC; Cho SC; Lee L; López J
    Neurodiagn J; 2017; 57(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 28436812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of sphincter muscle function before and after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty using a magnetic spinal stimulation technique.
    Kubota M; Suita S
    J Pediatr Surg; 2002 Apr; 37(4):617-22. PubMed ID: 11912522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Covariation of the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in a resting hand muscle.
    Vallence AM; Rurak BK; Fujiyama H; Hammond GR
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):927-936. PubMed ID: 36811686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of motor evoked potentials to predict dorsiflexion injuries during lumbosacral deformity surgery: importance of multiple myotomal monitoring.
    Lieberman JA; Lyon R; Jasiukaitis P; Berven SH; Burch S; Feiner J
    Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):377-385. PubMed ID: 30025994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External anal sphincter responses after S3 spinal root surface electrical stimulation.
    Pelliccioni G; Scarpino O
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(7):788-91. PubMed ID: 16941641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher success rate with transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials using constant-voltage stimulation compared with constant-current stimulation in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
    Shigematsu H; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Takatani T; Iwata E; Tanaka M; Okuda A; Morimoto Y; Masuda K; Tanaka Y; Tanaka Y
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 28483707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.