123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38306806)
1. 3D-DXA Based Finite Element Modelling for Femur Strength Prediction: Evaluation Against QCT.
Qasim M; López Picazo M; Ruiz Wills C; Noailly J; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Malouf Sierra J; Humbert L
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101471. PubMed ID: 38306806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D-3D reconstruction of the proximal femur from DXA scans: Evaluation of the 3D-Shaper software.
Dudle A; Gugler Y; Pretterklieber M; Ferrari S; Lippuner K; Zysset P
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1111020. PubMed ID: 36937766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.
Choisne J; Valiadis JM; Travert C; Kolta S; Roux C; Skalli W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():190-196. PubMed ID: 30077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D Finite Element Models Reconstructed From 2D Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Images Improve Hip Fracture Prediction Compared to Areal BMD in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sweden Cohort.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Jehpsson L; Ljunggren Ö; Rosengren BE; Karlsson MK; Isaksson H
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1258-1267. PubMed ID: 37417707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.
Khoo BC; Brown K; Cann C; Zhu K; Henzell S; Low V; Gustafsson S; Price RI; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1539-45. PubMed ID: 19107384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.
Dall'Ara E; Pahr D; Varga P; Kainberger F; Zysset P
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 21344244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental testing and biomechanical CT analysis of Chinese cadaveric vertebrae with different modeling approaches.
Wei Y; Feng W; Li G; Li Z; Liu Z; Cheng X; Yang H
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Jul; 93():8-16. PubMed ID: 34154778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone loss after bariatric surgery: discordant results between DXA and QCT bone density.
Yu EW; Bouxsein ML; Roy AE; Baldwin C; Cange A; Neer RM; Kaplan LM; Finkelstein JS
J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Mar; 29(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 23929784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural Parameters of the Proximal Femur by 3-Dimensional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Software: Comparison With Quantitative Computed Tomography.
Clotet J; Martelli Y; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Humbert L
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):550-562. PubMed ID: 28624339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of 3D finite element models from simulated DXA images for biofidelic simulations of sideways fall impact to the hip.
Grassi L; Fleps I; Sahlstedt H; Väänänen SP; Ferguson SJ; Isaksson H; Helgason B
Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115678. PubMed ID: 33022451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants.
Qasim M; Farinella G; Zhang J; Li X; Yang L; Eastell R; Viceconti M
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Sep; 27(9):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 27108118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of 3D Geometric Measures Derived From Quantitative Computed Tomography With Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men.
Borggrefe J; de Buhr T; Shrestha S; Marshall LM; Orwoll E; Peters K; Black DM; Glüer CC;
J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1550-8. PubMed ID: 26916713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study.
Boehm E; Kraft E; Biebl JT; Wegener B; Stahl R; Feist-Pagenstert I
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):179-188. PubMed ID: 37796283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Women with previous fragility fractures can be classified based on bone microarchitecture and finite element analysis measured with HR-pQCT.
Nishiyama KK; Macdonald HM; Hanley DA; Boyd SK
Osteoporos Int; 2013 May; 24(5):1733-40. PubMed ID: 23179565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women.
Danielson ME; Beck TJ; Karlamangla AS; Greendale GA; Atkinson EJ; Lian Y; Khaled AS; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl D; Ruppert K; Greenspan S; Vuga M; Cauley JA
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1379-88. PubMed ID: 22810918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
Iki M; Winzenrieth R; Tamaki J; Sato Y; Dongmei N; Kajita E; Kouda K; Yura A; Tachiki T; Kamiya K; Kagamimori S
Osteoporos Int; 2021 Nov; 32(11):2289-2299. PubMed ID: 34041560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
