143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38308719)
21. Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Fukuda T; Stolk E
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 33754886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study.
Mukuria C; Peasgood T; McDool E; Norman R; Rowen D; Brazier J
Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1073-1084. PubMed ID: 36805577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preference heterogeneity in health valuation: a latent class analysis of the Peru EQ-5D-5L values.
Karim S; Craig BM; Tejada RA; Augustovski F
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 36593473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard AS; Law EH; Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Xie F; Oppe M; Boye KS; Chapman RH; Gong CL; Balch A; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):931-941. PubMed ID: 31426935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Censoring in the time trade-off valuation of worse-than-dead EQ-5D-5L health states: can a time-based willingness-to-accept question be the solution?
Liao M; Rand K; Yang Z; Hsu CN; Lin HW; Luo N
Qual Life Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1165-1174. PubMed ID: 36564637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Oppe M; Stolk E; Shah K; Kreimeier S; Rivero-Arias O; Devlin N
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jul; 38(7):653-663. PubMed ID: 32297224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of composite time trade-off and discrete choice experiment methods for the valuation of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): a think-aloud study.
Yiu HHE; Al-Janabi H; Stewart-Brown S; Petrou S; Madan J
Qual Life Res; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2739-2751. PubMed ID: 35322304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
M Versteegh M; M Vermeulen K; M A A Evers S; de Wit GA; Prenger R; A Stolk E
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 27325326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Think of the Children: A Discussion of the Rationale for and Implications of the Perspective Used for EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation.
Lipman SA; Reckers-Droog VT; Kreimeier S
Value Health; 2021 Jul; 24(7):976-982. PubMed ID: 34243841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Using Both Time Tradeoff and Discrete Choice Experiments in Valuing the EQ-5D: Impact of Model Misspecification on Value Sets.
Waudby-Smith I; Pickard AS; Xie F; Pullenayegum EM
Med Decis Making; 2020 May; 40(4):483-497. PubMed ID: 32517541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China.
Yang Z; Jiang J; Wang P; Jin X; Wu J; Fang Y; Feng D; Xi X; Li S; Jing M; Zheng B; Huang W; Luo N
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):147-155. PubMed ID: 36396878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference Data.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Oppe M; Estévez-Carrillo A; Rivero-Arias O;
Value Health; 2022 May; 25(5):835-843. PubMed ID: 35500952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.
Oppe M; Devlin NJ; van Hout B; Krabbe PF; de Charro F
Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24969006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.
Åström M; Conte H; Berg J; Burström K
Qual Life Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 35201557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.
Longworth L; Yang Y; Young T; Mulhern B; Hernández Alava M; Mukuria C; Rowen D; Tosh J; Tsuchiya A; Evans P; Devianee Keetharuth A; Brazier J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(9):1-224. PubMed ID: 24524660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
