139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38308765)
21. Long-term results (after a mean 11.3years, and up to 22years, of follow-up) of the Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK™) in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Urbain A; Putman S; Migaud H; Pasquier G; Girard J; Dartus J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 May; 110(3):103795. PubMed ID: 38081358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cruciate Retaining compared with Posterior Stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort.
Mayne A; Harshavardhan HP; Johnston LR; Wang W; Jariwala A
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 Nov; 99(8):602-606. PubMed ID: 28653546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.
Parratte S; Pauly V; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21732024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 19487523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.
Hwang SC; Kong JY; Nam DC; Kim DH; Park HB; Jeong ST; Cho SH
Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 20514269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty.
Cholewinski P; Putman S; Vasseur L; Migaud H; Duhamel A; Behal H; Pasquier G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25952710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mobile-bearing prosthesis suppresses the postoperative rotational mismatch and improves patient-reported outcome measurements better than fixed-bearing prosthesis: rotational analysis by 3D measurement in total knee arthroplasty.
Ueyama H; Minoda Y; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Takemura S; Nakamura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Nov; 143(11):6781-6790. PubMed ID: 37418005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Unexpected high rate of revision of a modern cemented fixed bearing modular posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Steele JR; Wellman SS
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):137-144. PubMed ID: 34053294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years.
Dixon MC; Brown RR; Parsch D; Scott RD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 87(3):598-603. PubMed ID: 15741628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The EUROP total knee prosthesis: a ten-year follow-up study of a posterior cruciate-retaining design.
Mouttet A; Louis ML; Sourdet V
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Oct; 97(6):639-47. PubMed ID: 21723802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Outcome of Posterior-Stabilized, Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up, a Middle East Institution Experience.
Khalifa AA; Fayez M; Elkady H; Abdelaal AM; Elassal MA
J Knee Surg; 2022 Jun; 35(7):718-724. PubMed ID: 33126282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes.
Martin JR; Beahrs TR; Stuhlman CR; Trousdale RT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):1459-70. PubMed ID: 27605690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [10-Year Follow-Up of the NexGen CR Total Knee Prosthesis].
Hack J; Mai S; Siebert W
Z Orthop Unfall; 2015 Oct; 153(5):508-15. PubMed ID: 25993350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional Outcomes are Comparable Between Posterior Stabilized and Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs at Short-Term Follow-up.
Yacovelli S; Grau LC; Hozack WJ; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Mar; 36(3):986-990. PubMed ID: 32994108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses.
D'Lima DD; Trice M; Urquhart AG; Colwell CW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 May; (386):235-42. PubMed ID: 11347842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mid-term results of lateral unicondylar mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a multicentre study of 363 cases.
Walker T; Zahn N; Bruckner T; Streit MR; Mohr G; Aldinger PR; Clarius M; Gotterbarm T
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29305449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young and active patients with posterior stabilized design.
Meftah M; White PB; Ranawat AS; Ranawat CS
Knee; 2016 Mar; 23(2):318-21. PubMed ID: 26833096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kulkarni SS; Kim YH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 96(19):e168. PubMed ID: 25274796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]